Feb 4, 2013 - 5:23 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 7, '09 Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (65%) |
i have decided to put off the v6 for now and i'm going to put a 2zz into my project celica.
i will be posting pics as i get more and more into it. in the next couple days i'll have the 5s out and be picking up the 2zz and 6 speed trans. i can't wait to get this going and be the first of its kind. gonna be fun making the custom mounts and doing the wiring though! but yay for originality! (: my thoughts on this swap go from the facts that the 7th gen 2zz engine is known to be a powerhouse, along with the facts that there is so much aftermarket support for it and parts are fairly cheap but very easy to get at a moments notice! what do you think? -------------------- NOVAKx17
2000 Eclipse GT- DD=== oil pump went blown up and sold 1997 Celica ST- swapped and sold 2004 Ford explorer xlt 4x4- totaled 1997 Celica Convertible GT- Going Topless (; (18:32:21) yarik83: axel has a sensitive wife. i hear she used to be a lesbian and then became ferdi ( PARTING OUT A GT COUPE http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=88592 ) |
![]() |
Feb 8, 2013 - 3:47 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Apr 24, '08 From Orange County, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 33 (100%) |
beams blacktop into 6gc its been done here on the st182 :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJSEl30qn6s since the 2zzge is returnless fuel line and as well is the beams blacktop its the same crap. but your best bet would probably be buy a 3sge redtop, get the internals from a beams blacktop and then buy an aftermarket aem standalone ecu. you'd be at 220hp and about 30 more lbs of torque over the 2zzge. This post has been edited by BonzaiCelica: Feb 8, 2013 - 4:17 AM -------------------- Group buy to replicate Narrow E series transaxle parts
http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showto...p;#entry1107514 Items for Sale: http://www.6gc.net/forums/index.php?showto...p;#entry1107572 |
Feb 8, 2013 - 9:39 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Mar 8, '10 From Great White North Currently Offline Reputation: 3 (100%) |
the 2zz is a turd, if your gonna do something different make it good. Do a k20 Not offended but really? Lol .. I'm hoping your basing this off experience and not youtube videos whats youtube? 270whp on a k20, and I needed a supercharger to make 230 on a 2zz(no cams) but thats not my only reason for saying it. K20 is a better designed motor, better transmission. Either way I think its a bad ass idea. I would never do it, because I rather make power than be different(3sgte) but to each their own. Good luck dude |
Feb 8, 2013 - 10:44 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Dec 24, '12 From Gaithersburg, MD Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
the 2zz is a turd, if your gonna do something different make it good. Do a k20 Not offended but really? Lol .. I'm hoping your basing this off experience and not youtube videos whats youtube? 270whp on a k20, and I needed a supercharger to make 230 on a 2zz(no cams) but thats not my only reason for saying it. K20 is a better designed motor, better transmission. Either way I think its a bad ass idea. I would never do it, because I rather make power than be different(3sgte) but to each their own. Good luck dude With bolt ons and a tune, we managed to hit over 200hp no internals. Not all k20s are a greater designed for the k20a3 had much lower hp and redline than the rest of the fleet. The other k20 does have a better foundation that didn't start till after the 2zz was produced. And I see the 2zz most compared to the b-series engines. But yes, the 2zz isn't best choice for this car -------------------- 09 scion xd - 5spd- bbs- coilovers- exhaust- intake
94- Celica Gt 5spd- Stock for now |
Feb 8, 2013 - 11:10 AM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jan 4, '12 From US Currently Offline Reputation: 6 (100%) |
C-Lara you are right, 2ZZ is supposed to be competition for the B18C, the Integra GSR engine. In fact, VVTL-i was introduced exclusively in the 2ZZ to be Toyota's take on Honda's VTEC (which includes variable valve timing and lift, aka VVTL)
VTEC is not the same as VVT-i, because VTEC is a fixed increase/decrease in valve timing and lift, while VVT-i is continuously variable valve timing. With the VVTL-i, variable lift was introduced as well. Then Honda made i-VTEC which is the same as VVTL-i, where the timing is continuously variable and has lift increase as well. -------------------- 1993 Celica GT Coupe - sold
1994 Celica GT Liftback |
Feb 8, 2013 - 12:33 PM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Mar 16, '09 From New York Currently Offline Reputation: 23 (100%) |
good luck, gonna take a while
-------------------- |
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: October 25th, 2025 - 10:23 AM |