6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 3s-ge Beams or 3s-gte?, tell me what u think!
post Oct 31, 2003 - 7:12 PM
+Quote Post
SoundSlut_dotcom



Enthusiast
****
Joined Feb 16, '03
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




after this winter im gunna have about 3g's to play with for my car.. I was thinking of going with the redtop beams engine..simply for the fact not many have done it. and i heard its a pretty strong reliable engine, but i kno the 3sgte produces more hp.. which would be harder if u know? and which would u suggest for me thanx..


--------------------
post Oct 31, 2003 - 8:24 PM
+Quote Post
Coomer



Administrator
*****
Joined Aug 23, '02
From Seattle, WA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 14 (100%)




If you want something that's more unique, I'd go with the BEAMS 3S-GE, but I think you'll spend much more on the engine, because it's fairly new and not many cars were available with that engine. As far as installation goes, I'd guess that it'd be fairly similar mechanically to a 3S-GTE swap, but the wiring is probably more complex than the wiring for a ST185 3S-GTE, becuase the engine is newer and probably uses more electronics. If you get the BEAMS 3S-GE from a ST202 Celica or a Curren, you'll be able to use that tranny and not have to buy another tranny, like you would if you went with a 3S-GTE.

Either way it'll be sweet, but I think the BEAMS 3S-GE will be more expensive, and it doesn't have the torque all around the powerband like the 3S-GTE does.


--------------------
New Toyota project coming soon...
post Nov 2, 2003 - 9:53 PM
+Quote Post
SoundSlut_dotcom



Enthusiast
****
Joined Feb 16, '03
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




biggrin.gif thanks coomer


--------------------
post Nov 2, 2003 - 11:27 PM
+Quote Post
GeEkBoY



Enthusiast
**
Joined May 17, '03
From Ontario, Canada
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




If you want to be unique and powerful, you could always do the V6 swap. Though it would be one of the most difficult. To my knowledge, no one has done it in a sixth gen, just a fifth.

For the cash though the beams is for show and not a good bang for the buck, the power only comes through high revs.

Let us know what you end up doing.
post Nov 3, 2003 - 6:13 PM
+Quote Post
Rivo



Enthusiast
**
Joined Apr 28, '03
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




The power does not go through the high revs. The BEAMS VVT-i is not what everybody thinks of. There was a deep discussion of this on celica.net that was very explanatory. The BEAMS revs to 7400, only 400 above a 3sgte. The BEAMS can very solidly be placed at 240 hp with a good exhaust and an EMS, not so bad in a car that weighs 2590 lbs. I would take 240 N/A over 255 Turbo anyday, but that's just IMO and why I chose to go with the BEAMS.

Edit: http://celica.net/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?u...29;t=004695;p=1

Scroll near the bottom

This post has been edited by Rivo: Nov 3, 2003 - 6:13 PM
post Nov 3, 2003 - 7:08 PM
+Quote Post
GeEkBoY



Enthusiast
**
Joined May 17, '03
From Ontario, Canada
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




guess I should have been more specific. The beams does not have high torque figures and the peak torque is high at 6000 RPM with 159 ft-lbs.

A 2nd gen JDM 3sgte has more torque and is available much lower in the revs: 225 ft-lbs @ 3200 RPM. Gives you a much more streetable engine. Even though it only has 15 more horses, this would give you a much faster car than a beams, assuming you can get traction. Don't get me wrong, I would blow my load every time I opened the hood if I had a BEAMS under there, but I don't believe it is worth the cash.
post Nov 3, 2003 - 7:46 PM
+Quote Post
Rivo



Enthusiast
**
Joined Apr 28, '03
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (GeEkBoY @ Nov 3, 2003 - 5:08 PM)
225 ft-lbs @ 3200 RPM. Gives you a much more streetable engine...assuming you can get traction.

That's exactly my point, assuming you can get the traction. I have a car that's kickass in the twisties with the 5sfe. With 100 hp more, and w/o the traction worries of the GTE, I'll be flying.
post Nov 4, 2003 - 10:03 AM
+Quote Post
SoundSlut_dotcom



Enthusiast
****
Joined Feb 16, '03
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




thanks ill def let u kno wat i chose and how its goin smile.gif


--------------------
post Nov 4, 2003 - 1:15 PM
+Quote Post
97sccelica



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Aug 30, '02
From Anaheim, CA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (Rivo @ Nov 3, 2003 - 3:13 PM)
The power does not go through the high revs. The BEAMS VVT-i is not what everybody thinks of. There was a deep discussion of this on celica.net that was very explanatory. The BEAMS revs to 7400, only 400 above a 3sgte. The BEAMS can very solidly be placed at 240 hp with a good exhaust and an EMS, not so bad in a car that weighs 2590 lbs. I would take 240 N/A over 255 Turbo anyday, but that's just IMO and why I chose to go with the BEAMS.

Edit: http://celica.net/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?u...29;t=004695;p=1

Scroll near the bottom

hrm,

good exhaust and EMS on 3sgte would get easily over 300hp(@ crank)

i personally, would not like to have a beams 3sge. the torque is too high in the power band and it will never be a high amount unless you remove the VVTI and put in some custom cams, but then it wouldnt be a BEAMS engine anymore would it?

i agree on the v6 swap. get that engine with the TRD SC and it will fly. boat loads of torque!


--------------------
1994 Celica GT4 WRC Edition
@gt4.wrc on Instagram
post Nov 4, 2003 - 4:08 PM
+Quote Post
Rivo



Enthusiast
**
Joined Apr 28, '03
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




and boat loads of non traction. For strip purposes I would get a 3sgte with the MR2 tranny /w LSD. Only time I would want that much power/torque would be if I had an actual all-trac, with the AWD to handle it. For twisties purposes, I would take a 3rd gen 3sge and get the SC kit from JapanSpeed in the UK, not to mention the JUN stroker and other goodies. Massive HP and Torque figures aren't always what's going to get you what you want to do. A time and application for everything.

And no it wouldn't. New non-vvti cams = no more vvti. Just a pretty Head cover.
post Nov 4, 2003 - 8:53 PM
+Quote Post
97sccelica



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Aug 30, '02
From Anaheim, CA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (Rivo @ Nov 4, 2003 - 1:08 PM)
And no it wouldn't. New non-vvti cams = no more vvti. Just a pretty Head cover.

it is pretty, isn't it?


--------------------
1994 Celica GT4 WRC Edition
@gt4.wrc on Instagram
post Nov 5, 2003 - 12:03 AM
+Quote Post
snadman



Enthusiast
****
Joined Oct 1, '02
From Minnesota, USA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Not just pretty...the head cover gives iut all its power...didn't ypou know that if you have a pretty valve cover you get like 70hp more? Intake adds like 30..exhuast like 50...man...thats like 500 bucks for 150hp!!!!Stick ers add hp too! So i covered my car in bumper stickers...yeah I got a 10 second car baby!

just kidding baout all that...honestly the valve cover is pretty lol


--------------------
95 Toyota Celica GT
Dead for now --> Soon to have a 3S-GTE

02 WRX --> This is for speed
- Borla Exhaust
- TurboXS BOV
- Custom CAI

02 Civic EX
- MB Quart Reference 5.25" Components
- Rockford MTX 8" Subs in the doors
- Alpine Type S Rear Fills
- 2x Alpine SWR-1042D Subs in a custom fiberglass box
- Alpine F345 Amp for the front doors
- Alpine M605 on each Type R
- Phoenix Gold wiring
- Alpine CDA-9855 Head Unit
- Alpine Amp link
- 2x Rockford Fosgate 1 Farad Caps
- The best Viper 791 alarm install ever
post Nov 6, 2003 - 9:19 AM
+Quote Post
maikl



Enthusiast
***
Joined Mar 3, '03
From cyprus
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (Rivo @ Nov 3, 2003 - 4:13 PM)
The power does not go through the high revs. The BEAMS VVT-i is not what everybody thinks of. There was a deep discussion of this on celica.net that was very explanatory. The BEAMS revs to 7400, only 400 above a 3sgte. The BEAMS can very solidly be placed at 240 hp with a good exhaust and an EMS, not so bad in a car that weighs 2590 lbs. I would take 240 N/A over 255 Turbo anyday, but that's just IMO and why I chose to go with the BEAMS.

Edit: http://celica.net/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?u...29;t=004695;p=1

Scroll near the bottom

i have an beams and i am very pleased i eat type-r and gsr for breakfats, but what is an ems????


--------------------
user posted image
post Nov 6, 2003 - 2:11 PM
+Quote Post
Rivo



Enthusiast
**
Joined Apr 28, '03
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




EMS = Engine Management System. A standalone unit, such as the Haltech E6K or E11, can completely control everypart of your engine, and can be tuned to the specs you want. By using a dynometer and this software provided with the unit, you can take full advantage of the mods to your car, and tune the fuel/air mixture for peak performance throughout the power band. Can easily add 30hp just through tuning.
post Nov 7, 2003 - 4:57 AM
+Quote Post
maikl



Enthusiast
***
Joined Mar 3, '03
From cyprus
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (Rivo @ Nov 6, 2003 - 12:11 PM)
EMS = Engine Management System. A standalone unit, such as the Haltech E6K or E11, can completely control everypart of your engine, and can be tuned to the specs you want. By using a dynometer and this software provided with the unit, you can take full advantage of the mods to your car, and tune the fuel/air mixture for peak performance throughout the power band. Can easily add 30hp just through tuning.

do you know any ems that will fit ny car? i looked but found nothing


--------------------
user posted image
post Nov 10, 2003 - 5:38 PM
+Quote Post
Rivo



Enthusiast
**
Joined Apr 28, '03
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Of course, any EMS will fit ANY car. That's the whole point, it's a stand alone ECU that's non-car specific.

http://www.haltech.com

That's what I have

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: June 7th, 2025 - 5:58 PM