6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Intake questions-, how far, and sensor questions
post Jun 17, 2010 - 9:05 PM
+Quote Post
terbear4god4life



Enthusiast
****
Joined Oct 10, '08
From sweet home, OR
Currently Offline

Reputation: 3 (100%)




lol i just caught that rolleyes.gif


--------------------
"she can polish my strut bar anytime As long as her blow-off valve's in good order"
post Jun 17, 2010 - 11:58 PM
+Quote Post
hatchy_gt-s



Enthusiast
***
Joined Jan 16, '07
From covington, KY
Currently Offline

Reputation: 9 (77%)




QUOTE (azian_advanced @ Jun 17, 2010 - 1:58 AM) *
QUOTE (hatchy_gt-s @ Jun 16, 2010 - 10:45 PM) *
Edit: If you lengthen the pipe you want to decrease the size. If your car intakes 250cfm and your original pipe is 250cfm and you increase the length without decreasing the diameter you will have say a 350cfm pipe causing drag because your intake is at a -100cfm.
cfm= cubic feet per minute


so what you're recommending is to match the volume of the original pipe with the volume of the piping in the CAI setup?
the only reason one would reduce the pipe diameter is to increase flow velocity which helps reduce heat soak from the engine, but at the cost of pressure loss.

You dont loose pressure if you lengthen and decrease diameter. If I have something that is 14in long and 3in diameter that gives me 99 cubic inches , and if I extend it to 18in with a diameter of 1 3/4in it gives me 99 cubic inches of volume. So if I have the same volume I have the same amount of pressure.
The equation for Volume is;
Pi x radius squared x hight
or Pi*r2*h
or 3.14*r2*h
The equation for pressure is;
normal force(14.7)/area=pressure
or F/A=P
or for cars 14.7/A=P
The only thing you change when you change length is distance ie the time it takes to reach the car.(I dont think you really want me to get into the math of that to)

This post has been edited by hatchy_gt-s: Jun 17, 2010 - 11:59 PM
post Jun 24, 2010 - 1:39 AM
+Quote Post
chacha

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Dec 29, '05
From So-Cal
Currently Offline

Reputation: 12 (100%)




good stuff...surface to volume ratios...you want more power...swap to turbo and keep it at the 3" mark biggrin.gif
post Jun 25, 2010 - 10:37 AM
+Quote Post
solidxsnake

Enthusiast
**
Joined Apr 20, '09
Currently Offline

Reputation: 4 (100%)




QUOTE (hatchy_gt-s @ Jun 18, 2010 - 12:58 AM) *
QUOTE (azian_advanced @ Jun 17, 2010 - 1:58 AM) *
QUOTE (hatchy_gt-s @ Jun 16, 2010 - 10:45 PM) *
Edit: If you lengthen the pipe you want to decrease the size. If your car intakes 250cfm and your original pipe is 250cfm and you increase the length without decreasing the diameter you will have say a 350cfm pipe causing drag because your intake is at a -100cfm.
cfm= cubic feet per minute


so what you're recommending is to match the volume of the original pipe with the volume of the piping in the CAI setup?
the only reason one would reduce the pipe diameter is to increase flow velocity which helps reduce heat soak from the engine, but at the cost of pressure loss.

You dont loose pressure if you lengthen and decrease diameter. If I have something that is 14in long and 3in diameter that gives me 99 cubic inches , and if I extend it to 18in with a diameter of 1 3/4in it gives me 99 cubic inches of volume. So if I have the same volume I have the same amount of pressure.
The equation for Volume is;
Pi x radius squared x hight
or Pi*r2*h
or 3.14*r2*h
The equation for pressure is;
normal force(14.7)/area=pressure
or F/A=P
or for cars 14.7/A=P
The only thing you change when you change length is distance ie the time it takes to reach the car.(I dont think you really want me to get into the math of that to)



So again, how does changing the length of the pipe change flow rate or pressure? As you just said, the only thing that changes with length is the time it takes for air entering the filter to reach the throttle body (essentially). Changing the volume of the pipe won't change anything as long as the volume change is due to length and not diameter. As air is used by the engine, the air at the intake end of the pipe will displace the air that was just used due to the fact that a gas will expand to fill its container. Thus, as long as there is always air in the intake pipe (which there is, there's no vacuum there), there will always be the same pressure for any given length of pipe of the same diameter. Volume is entirely unrelated to pressure in this case.

In a closed container, volume and pressure are inversely related, absolutely. However, an intake pipe is not a closed container, one end is open to the atmosphere, the other feeds into the throttle body of the engine. Since this is in the case of a N/A engine, the pressure inside the pipe will always be 1kPa (roughly) no matter what the pipe's volume. The flow rate is entirely related to the diameter of the pipe (for a given pipe with the same gas moving through it, A1V1 = A2V2), thus changing the diameter of the pipe will surely change the flow rate (the narrowest part of the pipe will dictate the flow rate due to the bottleneck it causes). Also, the flow rate is related to the opening of the pipe. In this case, the opening would be the air filter, which surely causes a bottleneck over having a wide-open end. Changing the length will negligibly affect the flow rate, as once the air is used by the engine, it leaves an empty space which is then filled by more air in the pipe, pushed in by the force of the atmosphere. To prove it, you could take a pump with the inlet connected to a reservoir of a given volume of fluid. You'd get different lengths of the same diameter tubing and time the time it takes for the pump to empty the first reservoir, and what you'll notice is that the time it takes will not change no matter how long the tubing is. The given volume of the fluid divided by the time is the flow rate of the pump (in the units you used before: (cu. ft.)/(min)).

I'm not trying to deny what you're saying, but I just can't wrap my head around it and am debating for the sake of my own curiosity smile.gif

edit: Where does the 14.7 come from when you use 14.7/A = P? You didn't give units, but I assume you mean 14.7psi. That's entirely a false equation, because psi (lbs./sq. in.) is a unit of pressure, not force. Thus, you'd plug it into F/A=P for P, and not F.

This post has been edited by solidxsnake: Jun 25, 2010 - 10:39 AM


--------------------
~Moving on to a 2002 Corolla S~
R.I.P Tom Celica - 1994-2010
post Jun 25, 2010 - 11:08 AM
+Quote Post
blu94gt



Enthusiast
****
Joined Mar 23, '05
From Kansas City
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Has anyone ever tried a cowl-induction intake? I've been trying to come up with one but there's just too much stuff in the way and I'm budget limited.

I know people in the Miata community have had great luck with a cowl intake. Sort of like ram air, it pulls air from the high pressure zone in the cowl.



--------------------
1999 Celica GT
post Jun 25, 2010 - 12:13 PM
+Quote Post
solidxsnake

Enthusiast
**
Joined Apr 20, '09
Currently Offline

Reputation: 4 (100%)




QUOTE (blu94gt @ Jun 25, 2010 - 12:08 PM) *
Has anyone ever tried a cowl-induction intake? I've been trying to come up with one but there's just too much stuff in the way and I'm budget limited.

I know people in the Miata community have had great luck with a cowl intake. Sort of like ram air, it pulls air from the high pressure zone in the cowl.



I've never seen that before, looks really cool. Wonder how it performs.


--------------------
~Moving on to a 2002 Corolla S~
R.I.P Tom Celica - 1994-2010
post Jun 25, 2010 - 12:59 PM
+Quote Post
blu94gt



Enthusiast
****
Joined Mar 23, '05
From Kansas City
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (solidxsnake @ Jun 25, 2010 - 12:13 PM) *
QUOTE (blu94gt @ Jun 25, 2010 - 12:08 PM) *
Has anyone ever tried a cowl-induction intake? I've been trying to come up with one but there's just too much stuff in the way and I'm budget limited.

I know people in the Miata community have had great luck with a cowl intake. Sort of like ram air, it pulls air from the high pressure zone in the cowl.



I've never seen that before, looks really cool. Wonder how it performs.


Google Randall Intake, it'll come up with all sorts of stuff. It just ran straight into the stock filter box, according to Flyin' Miata's dyno results they got 5hp to the wheels on an all-stock 1.6 motor with that intake, running a 5mph fan blowing air over the car to simulate driving conditions.

I'm working on a design for the Celica. I'm going to take my cowl off later and measure where it would need to be to fit, and make sure it wouldn't sit low enough in the cowl to suck up water. May try to ghetto-rig something up with some materials at work to experiment with later today.


--------------------
1999 Celica GT
post Jun 25, 2010 - 5:19 PM
+Quote Post
azian_advanced



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Apr 18, '05
From Calgary
Currently Offline

Reputation: 20 (100%)




QUOTE (hatchy_gt-s @ Jun 17, 2010 - 11:58 PM) *
You dont loose pressure if you lengthen and decrease diameter. If I have something that is 14in long and 3in diameter that gives me 99 cubic inches , and if I extend it to 18in with a diameter of 1 3/4in it gives me 99 cubic inches of volume. So if I have the same volume I have the same amount of pressure.
The equation for Volume is;
Pi x radius squared x hight
or Pi*r2*h
or 3.14*r2*h
The equation for pressure is;
normal force(14.7)/area=pressure
or F/A=P
or for cars 14.7/A=P
The only thing you change when you change length is distance ie the time it takes to reach the car.(I dont think you really want me to get into the math of that to)


your equations apply for fixed mass (closed) systems (ie. tanks, piston cylinders, etc.).. but pressure changes in intake systems work differently as there is continuous flow (fixed volume or open systems) so you'd need to use flow energy equations (Darcy-Weisbach equation). more info


h = pressure loss, f = friction factor which is a function of the Reynold's number & inner pipe surface roughness & pipe diameter, V = flow velocity, g = gravity, L = Length, D = Diameter

reducing the length or increasing the diameter will reduce the pressure loss

btw, it's F/A = P = 14.7 psi, not 14.7/A = P

This post has been edited by azian_advanced: Jun 25, 2010 - 5:58 PM


--------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
post Jun 25, 2010 - 9:31 PM
+Quote Post
solidxsnake

Enthusiast
**
Joined Apr 20, '09
Currently Offline

Reputation: 4 (100%)




QUOTE (azian_advanced @ Jun 25, 2010 - 6:19 PM) *
QUOTE (hatchy_gt-s @ Jun 17, 2010 - 11:58 PM) *
You dont loose pressure if you lengthen and decrease diameter. If I have something that is 14in long and 3in diameter that gives me 99 cubic inches , and if I extend it to 18in with a diameter of 1 3/4in it gives me 99 cubic inches of volume. So if I have the same volume I have the same amount of pressure.
The equation for Volume is;
Pi x radius squared x hight
or Pi*r2*h
or 3.14*r2*h
The equation for pressure is;
normal force(14.7)/area=pressure
or F/A=P
or for cars 14.7/A=P
The only thing you change when you change length is distance ie the time it takes to reach the car.(I dont think you really want me to get into the math of that to)


your equations apply for fixed mass (closed) systems (ie. tanks, piston cylinders, etc.).. but pressure changes in intake systems work differently as there is continuous flow (fixed volume or open systems) so you'd need to use flow energy equations (Darcy-Weisbach equation). more info


h = pressure loss, f = friction factor which is a function of the Reynold's number & inner pipe surface roughness & pipe diameter, V = flow velocity, g = gravity, L = Length, D = Diameter

reducing the length or increasing the diameter will reduce the pressure loss

btw, it's F/A = P = 14.7 psi, not 14.7/A = P



Agh, friction, you bitch! That makes a lot more sense, I figured disregarding friction would be acceptable since the losses would be negligible.

Fluid dynamics are not my strongest point. tongue.gif


--------------------
~Moving on to a 2002 Corolla S~
R.I.P Tom Celica - 1994-2010
post Jun 25, 2010 - 11:42 PM
+Quote Post
mgnt232



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Mar 16, '09
From New York
Currently Offline

Reputation: 23 (100%)




thats pretty sweet, deff. update us with anything you do smile.gif


--------------------
I've spilt my heart into this car :) And I don't ever plan to stop

- 6GC for Life -
>Semper Fi<

1994 Cupra :p 3sgte
1995 Celica ST DD
1969 Chevelle SS

alllll balls. P2 approved!
post Jun 30, 2010 - 11:03 AM
+Quote Post
SleekCelica

Enthusiast
**
Joined Mar 28, '10
From Columbia, South Carolina
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




You should put an intake right out the top of your hood, taller than the car itself. It'll make 200+ horsepower easily. biggrin.gif


--------------------

1994 Celica GT, coupe, 5 speed.
Front strut brace, cherrybomb glasspack, intake.
post Jun 30, 2010 - 12:01 PM
+Quote Post
Nartanian



Enthusiast
***
Joined Mar 26, '09
From Minnesota
Currently Offline

Reputation: 5 (100%)




All this talk and arguing over equations only to add a max of 5hp to an N/A car. O well, good info nonetheless.


--------------------
"God created turbo lag to give V8's a chance"
post Jun 30, 2010 - 1:44 PM
+Quote Post
SwissFerdi

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jun 18, '09
From Orlando
Currently Offline

Reputation: 8 (100%)




QUOTE (SleekCelica @ Jun 30, 2010 - 12:03 PM) *
You should put an intake right out the top of your hood, taller than the car itself. It'll make 200+ horsepower easily. biggrin.gif


No, you should run a pipe from the intake manifold through the front bumper so it juts out, and connect it to the exhaust of a vehicle conveniently placed a few feet in front of the car. Engines release exhaust gases, right? Now you'll be releasing MOAR gas, which can only translate to MOAR power.


--------------------
'97 ST \ Eibach \ KYB \ Kenwood \ Alpine \ Cusco \ OEM+ [sold 10/18]
'93 MX-5 LE
post Jul 1, 2010 - 9:09 AM
+Quote Post
solidxsnake

Enthusiast
**
Joined Apr 20, '09
Currently Offline

Reputation: 4 (100%)




QUOTE (SwissFerdi @ Jun 30, 2010 - 2:44 PM) *
QUOTE (SleekCelica @ Jun 30, 2010 - 12:03 PM) *
You should put an intake right out the top of your hood, taller than the car itself. It'll make 200+ horsepower easily. biggrin.gif


No, you should run a pipe from the intake manifold through the front bumper so it juts out, and connect it to the exhaust of a vehicle conveniently placed a few feet in front of the car. Engines release exhaust gases, right? Now you'll be releasing MOAR gas, which can only translate to MOAR power.


laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif


--------------------
~Moving on to a 2002 Corolla S~
R.I.P Tom Celica - 1994-2010

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: June 18th, 2025 - 2:49 PM