civic vs supra, vid Options

[lagos]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhzyBSQmb_c

pretty bad ass.

[IdiotStick]

Haha

"What are ya running?"

"Just a little 4 cylinder"

ZIM ZIM ZIM ZIIIIIIM

[KB-2]

civics are gay!

[Chanh55]

Lol that last part was funny... hahah

[x_itchy_b_x]

hahaha. cool vid, wicked amazing, gutted, sounds awesome, must get all the chicks civic

[Hanyo]

hahahaha

[j0e_p3t]

what?! i refuse to believe that a civic is better than a supra. and that civic sounds so freakin annoying.

[spolski07]

supra sounded REAL quiet for being a 400HP car
my guess
its a NA stock supra...
that firebird was funny tho
hahaha

[slvr_celica_GT_8...]

id have to say that was preety nice civic

[ExSane]

That Civic is 300whp, fully built motor. Seen this vid already.

This post has been edited by ExSane: Jan 16, 2007 - 11:56 PM

[Kadett]

Well I rather own that Supra over that Civic anytime. Comfort+low end torque + RWD

Unfair match to begin with if the stats are true.

1600kgs Supra with 400whp = 4kg per whp
900kg Civic with 300whp = 3kg per whp

As a 1/4mile car it may be fun,
As a daily driver, no way.

"he car goes 13.05 at about 101mph at the track "

Is it me or does it sound strange that a 300WHP, 900 kg car is still so slow. a 400+WHP Supra would definatly be quicker then that.

This post has been edited by Kadett: Jan 17, 2007 - 12:35 PM

[afroman]

that civic is really really fast. Im from Sioux Falls SD and he has had it tuned there. ive seen it own a 400hp turbo integra. loud as hell, but awsome.
-Aaron-

[doGGy]

End part of the video with this Firebird - PURE awesome lmao

And supra is a supra - never was impresed by them GT4>Supra....

[Consynx]

400hp in a supra is doable just with a boost controller and some bpus...
it's no biggy at all.

plus, 3400lbs doesn't help

either way though, he should have had a better launch than that...the sequentials main advertising when the supra was for sale was "ferrari beating acceleration"...supposed to be 0-60 in 3.9 stock...so yea, even though it's a slow car, i just woulda thought the rwd would have helped the dig more than that, even though the boost lag would have hurt.

[lagos]

"oh, she'll get off the line...."

[playr158]

that was the WORST sounding civic EVER...

but pretty quick

[rayneezy23]

that one guy tufy should race this guy haha

[snapshotgt]

that one guy tufy should race this guy haha

by tufy ...hopefully

[Glitch001]

that one guy tufy should race this guy haha

Look at the comment he apparently runs low 13's. Tufy runs 10's, it wouldnt even be a conest. (no Thats not fast at all, I dont believe its a 400 hp supra either, wether it be stick or auto, or modded or not. I saw rims but who cares? The civic is gutted with an expensive motor and im guessing a build. So no, thats like me trying to race a semi-truck with my mr2 then brag out it.

Building a 10 seconds civic is cool and all, yes its fast but at the end of the day when you get out of your car and walk to your door, you turn around and its still a civic. You can spraypaint crap gold, wont make it anything other than crap.

This post has been edited by Glitch001: Jan 18, 2007 - 1:11 AM

[Kwanza26]

It's a 400hp Supra. Anything less would not be able to catch that civic in the high gears. Look at that third run.

BTW... apples and oranges people. A 400hp supra isn't that fast. That's basically stock with a boost controller. What does a Supra run stock? High 13's at best. A 400 hp Supra is a mid-low 13 car at best.

AND... hate for the Civic... well... I think that bandwagon has left the station. It's all about drft'n now!

[Consynx]

I'm with Kwanza...
supra is just BPU, and not that fast.
it SHOULD have dont better against the car from the dig, but i'm guessing it was mainly driver there...
ESPECIALLY NOW, knowing that the civic runs 13's...because that's what the supra SHOULD run, and low ones at that.

[celicaST]

i respect any car that is made fast, but that civic sounded horrible. i would hate driving that. would take the supra anyday. video isnt that surprising though.

[slvr_celica_GT_8...]

i kinda liked how it sounded to tell yea the truth lol

[XS4lv1Truch0x]

why no fwd traction problems?????

wtf man that civic's from hell!

[Kwanza26]

why no fwd traction problems?????

wtf man that civic's from hell!

cause less low-end torque and flat bottom-end = less traction problems from a stop...

AND... I don't know what you guys are complaining about the engine sound. Doesn't sound bad... look at his interior... or lack thereof. When people say that... then ride around with fart cans... only tells me you don't know how a 4 cylinder at 9000 rpms is supposed to sound....

[Consynx]

my buddy's dc2 revs up to 9k...
doesn't quite sound like that, but he's got a cat, and non stripped...i really heard the motor over the exhaust...i think
god i need another ride in it. . .

[Glitch001]

why no fwd traction problems?????

wtf man that civic's from hell!

cause less low-end torque and flat bottom-end = less traction problems from a stop...

AND... I don't know what you guys are complaining about the engine sound. Doesn't sound bad... look at his interior... or lack thereof. When people say that... then ride around with fart cans... only tells me you don't know how a 4 cylinder at 9000 rpms is supposed to sound....

A HONDA revving to 9k maybe, my car doesnt sound anything like that near 9000. All cars sound different, but the second I had to drive that sound more than 1 hour I would want to kill myself. Any ammount of money will make you fast, but is it worth it?

[Kwanza26]

A HONDA revving to 9k maybe, my car doesnt sound anything like that near 9000. All cars sound different, but the second I had to drive that sound more than 1 hour I would want to kill myself. Any ammount of money will make you fast, but is it worth it?

if you don't know what you're talking about... please do not speak. thank you...

This post has been edited by Kwanza26: Jan 22, 2007 - 2:37 AM