6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> intercooler
post Jun 7, 2004 - 7:21 PM
+Quote Post
celicaracer18



Enthusiast
***
Joined May 23, '04
From Meridian, MS
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




does any body have pics of how they mounted a FMIC

and where is a good place to get one w/out paying $1000(links please)

whats the best size, i am thinking around the 600-700 hp range(i know this is high, but i don't want to have to buy one twice, i want to get a good one now while i have the $ so i won't have to get a bigger one someday when this is no longer my daily driver)


--------------------
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 27)
post Jun 7, 2004 - 9:40 PM
+Quote Post
forkee



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Nov 13, '02
From So Cal
Currently Offline

Reputation: 3 (100%)




check out my second link in my signature.......

u can find a gripload on ebay for under 1g


--------------------
post Jun 8, 2004 - 3:35 AM
+Quote Post
Four

Enthusiast
*
Joined Aug 30, '02
From tacoma WA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




look at profile for pics, but i mounted it to the front impact/supprt bar. just welded the top of the cooler to the bottom of the bar.
post Jun 8, 2004 - 10:29 AM
+Quote Post
sphinx



Enthusiast
***
Joined Apr 10, '03
From South Central Los Angeles
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




not a bad price if you ask me


AUD $730 = $515 US

http://www.flyn.com.au/hybrid_intercooler.htm


user posted image

This post has been edited by sphinx: Jun 8, 2004 - 10:29 AM
post Jun 8, 2004 - 11:19 AM
+Quote Post
jontechie



Enthusiast
**
Joined Oct 25, '02
From London- England
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




The front mount intercooler does look good but someone argued that it introduces
more lag in the response because of the longer induction to throttle body path
the air travels. On our cars the examples I've seen always seem to have the pipework running over the exhaust manifold which defeats the purpose of cooling the air to begin with.
post Jun 8, 2004 - 11:53 AM
+Quote Post
Negative



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Apr 28, '04
From Houston, Texas
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




point.


--------------------
IPB Image
post Jun 8, 2004 - 12:04 PM
+Quote Post
Supersprynt



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Feb 10, '03
From Connecticut
Currently Offline

Reputation: 11 (100%)




I say St205 watercharged IC...best way to go.

The A2A is horrible, i'm upset with mine and plan on going ST205 but its quite an effort locating everything.


--------------------
post Jun 9, 2004 - 2:28 AM
+Quote Post
jontechie



Enthusiast
**
Joined Oct 25, '02
From London- England
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




If you go for the ST205 Intercooler route make sure you heat lag the underside
of the IC with Aluminium coated heat resist fibreglass wadding' it will help prevent
heat soak when the cars not moving. My IC would get so hot if the car was stationary for a few minutes, you could fry en egg on it. Toyota's standard
heat shield is pretty pathetic. Wadding available from Demon Tweeks :

Demon Tweeks


Search Under Aluminised heat Barrier,


Jon


post Jun 9, 2004 - 3:37 AM
+Quote Post
shid



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 8, '04
From LA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (jontechie @ Jun 8, 2004 - 4:19 PM)
The front mount intercooler does look good but someone argued that it introduces
more lag in the response because of the longer induction to throttle body path
the air travels. On our cars the examples I've seen always seem to have the pipework running over the exhaust manifold which defeats the purpose of cooling the air to begin with.


Do you mean "over the manifold" like this picture of Itchy's setup?

user posted image

My understanding is, after the air passes through the intake, to the turbo fan- then it goes over the exhaust manifold (yes, heating it up), then passing through the intercooler which then goes to the TB- not passing over the manifold again.

Would it be best not to pass over the exhaust manifold in the first place? Yes. Does it really matter given the order of things? I doubt it. The turbo heats up the air a lot in the first place!

This post has been edited by shid: Jun 9, 2004 - 3:37 AM
post Jun 9, 2004 - 6:15 AM
+Quote Post
hyp3rk1d



Enthusiast
***
Joined Sep 22, '03
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




www.johnnyracecar.com
post Jun 9, 2004 - 1:29 PM
+Quote Post
celicaracer18



Enthusiast
***
Joined May 23, '04
From Meridian, MS
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




QUOTE (sphinx @ Jun 8, 2004 - 3:29 PM)
not a bad price if you ask me


AUD $730 = $515 US

http://www.flyn.com.au/hybrid_intercooler.htm


user posted image

i really like this one i wonder how much shipping is to the us

i don't want a smaller one like in the pics above, but how would i mount a large one like that, i won't have an ac condensor, but the support thing that comes down to hold up the piece the low beams are attached to is in the way and the bumper


--------------------
post Jun 9, 2004 - 2:24 PM
+Quote Post
Jabberwock

Enthusiast
***
Joined Sep 22, '03
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




I would go custom W/A IC or go with the Large FMIC and Spray it with N20 it may help from the lag.

But custom W/A is your best bet.
post Jun 9, 2004 - 2:51 PM
+Quote Post
XSTeknique



Enthusiast
**
Joined Dec 21, '02
From Orlando
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




It seems like common sense, but you'd be surprised how many Celica owners run the piping over the exhaust manifold because it's easier. Might as well not have done the A2A anyway.
post Jun 9, 2004 - 3:48 PM
+Quote Post
shid



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jan 8, '04
From LA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




XST, see my post
post Jun 9, 2004 - 9:22 PM
+Quote Post
celicaracer18



Enthusiast
***
Joined May 23, '04
From Meridian, MS
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




i think i am going to run it somewhat like the pic shid posted
and i am going to the N-tercooler kit from nx and probably spray co2 because it way cheapper, and if i need a little extra, i'll get some nitrous instead.
i am probably ordering the hybrid one, i have been talking to flyin today and he sai they still have them in stock ready to ship and shipping is approx $130 aud

how much would that be all together in usd exactly, i used to have a currency converter on my laptop someplace, but can't seem to find it


--------------------
post Jun 10, 2004 - 3:15 AM
+Quote Post
jontechie



Enthusiast
**
Joined Oct 25, '02
From London- England
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (shid @ Jun 9, 2004 - 1:37 AM)
QUOTE (jontechie @ Jun 8, 2004 - 4:19 PM)
The front mount intercooler does look good but someone argued that it introduces
more lag in the response because of the longer induction to throttle body path
the air travels. On our cars the examples I've seen always seem to have the pipework running over the exhaust manifold which defeats the purpose of cooling the air to begin with.


Do you mean "over the manifold" like this picture of Itchy's setup?

user posted image

My understanding is, after the air passes through the intake, to the turbo fan- then it goes over the exhaust manifold (yes, heating it up), then passing through the intercooler which then goes to the TB- not passing over the manifold again.

Would it be best not to pass over the exhaust manifold in the first place? Yes. Does it really matter given the order of things? I doubt it. The turbo heats up the air a lot in the first place!

That set up isn't too bad as the pipework to the throttle body avoids the manifold
( I was thinking in terms of the GT4 throttle body on a right hand drive), the
pipework would have to go very near the manifold unless you can route the pipework around the ABS area. Even with itchy's set up the intercooler has to work harder as hot turbine compressed air is made even hotter by its path over
the manifold. Anyone got a FMI installed that manages to avoid the exhaust
manifold ?
post Jun 10, 2004 - 4:01 AM
+Quote Post
Four

Enthusiast
*
Joined Aug 30, '02
From tacoma WA
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




technically there is more lag witha fmic set up. but i have never noticed any, and i argee with trance4 at celica.net who said its seems like the turbo spools up quicker witha fmic set up.

also the pic of the 5sfte set up is the way you want to do ur fmic pipes. when u go over the exhuast manifold with the pipe that goes into your throttle body thats kind of an oxymoron.
post Jun 10, 2004 - 2:55 PM
+Quote Post
x_itchy_b_x



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Nov 12, '02
From Webster Ma.
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




i had a jimmy rig heat sheild on the exhaust manifold. but i took it off looked horrible, anybody have a 3sgte one around?


--------------------
post Jun 10, 2004 - 3:52 PM
+Quote Post
uzthedentist



Enthusiast
**
Joined Mar 21, '04
From united kingdom
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE
Anyone got a FMI installed that manages to avoid the exhaust
manifold ?


u mean like this?

user posted image


--------------------
GT4 ST205 79 modifications and rising!!
spec list: http://sox-japoc.co.uk/forum/garage.php?mo..._vehicle&CID=10
post Jun 10, 2004 - 4:44 PM
+Quote Post
Drocay



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Oct 3, '02
From Va Team 6gc
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




and the hotness comes out.


--------------------
IPB Image
All I have in this world is my Balls and my Word and I'm not breaking em for no one,- Tony Montana
Team 6gc 2005
post Jun 11, 2004 - 2:38 AM
+Quote Post
jontechie



Enthusiast
**
Joined Oct 25, '02
From London- England
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (uzthedentist @ Jun 10, 2004 - 1:52 PM)
QUOTE
Anyone got a FMI installed that manages to avoid the exhaust
manifold ?


u mean like this?

user posted image

Spot On !! biggrin.gif
post Jun 11, 2004 - 11:10 PM
+Quote Post
celicaracer18



Enthusiast
***
Joined May 23, '04
From Meridian, MS
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




i would still like to have some pics of how people mounted their IC
i don't want to welt and if i doo it will be on the back side

also i was looking at some mags and saw sme installs on other cars and they didn't put the bumper thing(peice of metal that conects the frame behind the front bumper

also doesn't the bumper attatch to the metals thing i was talking about that people are welding the IC to, do you have to cut the bumper


--------------------
post Jun 13, 2004 - 3:24 PM
+Quote Post
FallenHero



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Dec 26, '02
From Alabama
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




dude, mounting an intercooler would be NO sweat. Don't worry about it.
post Jun 14, 2004 - 7:48 PM
+Quote Post
celicaracer18



Enthusiast
***
Joined May 23, '04
From Meridian, MS
Currently Offline

Reputation: 2 (100%)




ok here is the thing the int. i am looking at is 300mm tall which is like 11.8 in, will it stick out the bottom of bumper if it is welded to the bottom of the that bar


--------------------
post Jun 14, 2004 - 8:12 PM
+Quote Post
Uppitycracker



Enthusiast
****
Joined Jul 12, '03
From Chatham, Ont
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




As far as increased turbo lag with a fmic setup I dont think that should be the case. Aslong as the piping interior is the same volume in both instances the difference in spool should be trivial. Thats just out of my understanding of physics not experience.

So if you go with a fmic the piping should be smaller in diameter then if it where top mount, but not too much smaller or it'll bottle neck.

This post has been edited by Uppitycracker: Jun 14, 2004 - 8:13 PM
post Jun 14, 2004 - 9:00 PM
+Quote Post
KAMiX

Enthusiast
***
Joined Mar 4, '03
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




^^ Iunno about that. I agree that flow is proportionate to volume, but when you are talking an extra 1-2m of piping I don't think it'd work to run a pipe that thin. The theory is right but there's probably a cut off size as you said.

Also shid you are right to an extent with the piping over the manifold, but an exhaust manifold gets extrememly hot, and they are pretty big so there will be a decent amount of heat radiaton. Any piping running across it is going to pick up a lot of heat. Adding say 10-15 degrees C of heat to the air temp before it hits the IC might only give you 5-8 degrees up in the throttle body (total guesstimate), but that still isn't going for the most eficient setup.. we all know that intake temps make big changes to A/F ratios and timing...
post Jun 15, 2004 - 4:14 PM
+Quote Post
Uppitycracker



Enthusiast
****
Joined Jul 12, '03
From Chatham, Ont
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (KAMiX @ Jun 14, 2004 - 7:00 PM)
^^ Iunno about that. I agree that flow is proportionate to volume, but when you are talking an extra 1-2m of piping I don't think it'd work to run a pipe that thin. The theory is right but there's probably a cut off size as you said.

Also shid you are right to an extent with the piping over the manifold, but an exhaust manifold gets extrememly hot, and they are pretty big so there will be a decent amount of heat radiaton. Any piping running across it is going to pick up a lot of heat. Adding say 10-15 degrees C of heat to the air temp before it hits the IC might only give you 5-8 degrees up in the throttle body (total guesstimate), but that still isn't going for the most eficient setup.. we all know that intake temps make big changes to A/F ratios and timing...

Ya exactly, obviously you cant keep the volume axactly the same, because like you and I said it would cause a bottle neck if the diameter is to small. Im just basically saying to reduce the lag pick a smaller size of pipe.

I first thought of this with my mr2, thinking about what it would take to do a fmic with it. Thats where I first thought of the relative volume of the piping, but obviously you'd be talking about more then a couple meters and it just would create more problems then its worth.
post Jun 15, 2004 - 4:23 PM
+Quote Post
Uppitycracker



Enthusiast
****
Joined Jul 12, '03
From Chatham, Ont
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




dp

This post has been edited by Uppitycracker: Jun 15, 2004 - 4:24 PM

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: July 20th, 2025 - 2:22 PM