![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jun 13, '05 From Poughkeepsie, NY Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) ![]() |
-------------------- ![]() Kawi Love |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 21, '04 From New York City Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
sweet if it was meant for tracks. if it's DD, it'll suck especially on bumpy highways. a/c and stereo optional? wtf? but yea.. it's an awesome ride..
![]() -------------------- |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Apr 16, '06 From Jackson, MS Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
Clean other than that wing... wings on verts in general just dont appeal to me.
![]() ~FlamingCelica This post has been edited by FlamingCelica: Apr 11, 2007 - 3:18 PM -------------------- 94 Red Celica ST
|
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 3, '04 From pittsburgh Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
QUOTE(FlamingCelica @ Apr 11, 2007 - 8:17 PM) [snapback]545668[/snapback] Clean other than that wing... wings on verts in general just dont appeal to me. ![]() ~FlamingCelica that wing is hot...not 2 mention it actually does something -------------------- ![]() Now SR powered |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Apr 16, '06 From Jackson, MS Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
QUOTE(OrbitalGT95 @ Apr 11, 2007 - 3:20 PM) [snapback]545670[/snapback] QUOTE(FlamingCelica @ Apr 11, 2007 - 8:17 PM) [snapback]545668[/snapback] Clean other than that wing... wings on verts in general just dont appeal to me. ![]() ~FlamingCelica that wing is hot...not 2 mention it actually does something I realize that it's fuctional, but I just dont think it looks very good. ![]() ~FlamingCelica -------------------- 94 Red Celica ST
|
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jun 13, '05 From Poughkeepsie, NY Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) ![]() |
From my understanding its weight reduction is only 90LBS for the whole car...thats not very good.
I would hope to see more weight reduction closer to 300lbs..500 would be AMAZING. I also expected to see more hp from the motor, maybe closer to 250 if not 270hp at the crank..idk, i guess it depends on price really. If its like $500 more then the regular s2k then cool, but if its like 5k more...ha, the suspension work better be HELLYA good. I'd like to see lap times from both the CR and standard s2k in 1/4 mile, and road course to see the REAL differences. -------------------- ![]() Kawi Love |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Apr 18, '05 From Calgary Currently Offline Reputation: 20 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(devilsden97 @ Apr 11, 2007 - 3:40 PM) [snapback]545675[/snapback] From my understanding its weight reduction is only 90LBS for the whole car...thats not very good. I'd like to see lap times from both the CR and standard s2k in 1/4 mile, and road course to see the REAL differences. from another article about the CR: QUOTE It is significantly faster on a track, according to Honda The result of these changes is a claimed two-second reduction in the S2000 CR’s lap time around Honda’s Tochigi test track. That’s a huge difference; you could add 50 horsepower to a regular S2000 and you might not see your lap time drop that much. imo, now that the CR doesn't have the soft top, and A/C and stereo package are now optional (not standard, to save weight), bigger and stickier tires, stiffer suspension, same hp rating and nearly the same weight (seeing that there's no soft top and a/c), etc etc... it's not something to go crazy over.. i mean, just about anyone with a standard s2k hardtop can do the same with the same increase in price (~$3k-$5k more than a standard s2k) and just buy aftermarket parts.. perhaps the only real benefit would be the quicker steering response?? ![]() -------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Feb 18, '07 From So Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 3 (100%) ![]() |
s2k's r very overpriced i think, i mean a slick looking car but i think they need more power, i hear its kinda hard to get much more power out of them wthout forced induction.
-------------------- Your signature is not allowed on 6GC - Defgeph
|
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Apr 2, '06 From Socal Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
s2000 is a very well balanced car just needs more torque.
|
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 16, '05 From Toronto, Ontario Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(SlickRick @ Apr 12, 2007 - 1:52 AM) [snapback]545875[/snapback] s2k's r very overpriced if u think they're overpriced in the states... they're REALLY overpriced in canada in states it's $34250USD new before tax in canada it's $44000USD new before tax altho my friend just bought one and i thnk they're pretty nice lol... -------------------- |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: July 28th, 2025 - 9:15 AM |