 Ron Paul Owns |
 Dec 20, 2007 - 12:28 AM
|
 
|
 Enthusiast  Joined Aug 31, '02 From Philadelphia, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%)  |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqPhrqllHzY
got to love a guy that cuts through the BS. This post has been edited by lagos: Dec 20, 2007 - 12:29 AM -------------------- 15PSI - 30MPG - Megasquirt Tuned
|
 |
Replies
(1 - 12)
|
Dec 20, 2007 - 12:58 AM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Jun 23, '05 Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) |
i was just going to make a thread supporting ron paul for 2008. this guy needs to be elected. do yourself and our country a favor, get involved, get informed, and vote this year
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG_HuFtP8w8...feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWfIhFhelm8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKZmIzEMUN8...feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG2PUZoukfA...feature=related a good one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4kxTkhwR_Q...feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFfdB5OzlyQ...feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anmlPvmd1Ew ron paul in 1988 This post has been edited by celicaST: Dec 20, 2007 - 1:13 AM --------------------  I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry. And that's extra scary to me, because there's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside. |
|
Dec 20, 2007 - 10:54 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 17, '04 From Illinois Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
I would love to see this guy as president - the only problem is that he won't get the Republican nomination and if he runs as an independent, a vote for him would most likely be a vote for Hillary and I am not going to do anything to support her.
-------------------- QUOTE(lagos @ Jul 10, 2006 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]454118[/snapback] i know your trying to do the right thing for your motor, but this is one of those times where you should just trust the guys who have had their swaps for a while and have done a ton of research into this. |
|
Dec 20, 2007 - 11:10 AM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Feb 10, '03 From Connecticut Currently Offline Reputation: 11 (100%) |
I'm so tired of the american political system.
-------------------- |
|
Dec 21, 2007 - 6:30 AM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Aug 8, '07 From United States Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) |
Sorry, but he has some great views but he lost my vote. Between the crazy supporters of his, the death threat on Glenn Beck from his supporters and his weird history.
I like his view on the Constitution, but I would not be able to handle his psycho supporters if he was elected. He is a wasted vote for Rep. and as stated, basically giving the Dems a lead. -------------------- |
|
Dec 21, 2007 - 8:59 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 10, '03 From Connecticut Currently Offline Reputation: 11 (100%) |
Yeah, that's exactly why this political system is screwy.
You won't vote for someone because of his/her supporters? And you won't vote for someone because it'll give the Democrats a vote because nobody else will vote for this guy? If everyone voted for him who wanted him, then it would be a clear indicator of what this country wants, instead people fall into line with candidates who can't do the job. I won't vote for Hilary, but I will vote for Obama. -------------------- |
|
Dec 21, 2007 - 2:56 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Jan 17, '04 From Illinois Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(Supersprynt @ Dec 21, 2007 - 7:59 AM) [snapback]624782[/snapback] Yeah, that's exactly why this political system is screwy. You won't vote for someone because of his/her supporters? And you won't vote for someone because it'll give the Democrats a vote because nobody else will vote for this guy? If everyone voted for him who wanted him, then it would be a clear indicator of what this country wants, instead people fall into line with candidates who can't do the job. I won't vote for Hilary, but I will vote for Obama. I agree its screwy but people need to take responsibility for the ramifications of their votes. Take Ralph Nader's supporters for example. They elected Bush when they as a group would have overwhelming would have favored Gore (and elected him) if it had been a two person race. So, what is screwier? Supporting your first choice understanding that your third choice will be elected or supporting and electing your second choice? This post has been edited by jgreening: Dec 21, 2007 - 2:56 PM -------------------- QUOTE(lagos @ Jul 10, 2006 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]454118[/snapback] i know your trying to do the right thing for your motor, but this is one of those times where you should just trust the guys who have had their swaps for a while and have done a ton of research into this. |
|
Dec 21, 2007 - 4:21 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 31, '02 From Philadelphia, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) |
QUOTE(Harold_Fastwaker @ Dec 21, 2007 - 6:30 AM) [snapback]624769[/snapback] Sorry, but he has some great views but he lost my vote. Between the crazy supporters of his, the death threat on Glenn Beck from his supporters and his weird history. I like his view on the Constitution, but I would not be able to handle his psycho supporters if he was elected. He is a wasted vote for Rep. and as stated, basically giving the Dems a lead. your talking about one crazy guy that posted a death threat on you tube? what about guy that held people hostage in hillary's campaign office that worked for her? im sure obama gets death threats for being a black guy trying to run too. crazy people are out there. it has nothing to do with the canidates. vote for people based on their policy, track recored and your own bullsh1t meter. i honestly dont agree with every single thing that ron paul has to say, but i would vote for him based on the simple fact that he has been very consistent on his views and i know hes not just telling me what i want to hear just to get into office. -------------------- 15PSI - 30MPG - Megasquirt Tuned
|
|
Dec 21, 2007 - 7:54 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Oct 1, '07 From Sacramento, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Im voting for him. Ron Paul Revolution baby!
|
|
Dec 22, 2007 - 3:16 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Aug 8, '07 From United States Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) |
What is his plan again? Remove the IRS and replace it with nothing. Then give a flat tax on everything out there.
Yeah yeah, great idea. England tried that a few hundred years ago, how did that end up? -------------------- |
|
Dec 22, 2007 - 9:37 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 10, '03 From Connecticut Currently Offline Reputation: 11 (100%) |
I like him, mainly because he wants to limit federal government and let people do their thing and worry about our country instead of others. On top of that there's the couple of other things I don't agree with him on. Mainly the disagreement of Roe V. Wade. I may still vote for him.
This post has been edited by Supersprynt: Dec 22, 2007 - 9:46 PM -------------------- |
|
Dec 23, 2007 - 4:28 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Jun 23, '05 Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) |
QUOTE(Harold_Fastwaker @ Dec 22, 2007 - 1:16 AM) [snapback]624982[/snapback] What is his plan again? Remove the IRS and replace it with nothing. Then give a flat tax on everything out there. Yeah yeah, great idea. England tried that a few hundred years ago, how did that end up? here again http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWfIhFhelm8 have you listened to him? he clearly states that in order to eliminate the income tax, government first must dramatically reduce its spending abroad and at home. if on the other hand we want government to take care of us from "cradle to grave" and engage in nation-building, then the income tax cant be abolished. limited government is key there are a few issues i disagree on with him, but he is the only candidate that is authentic and sticks to his principles no matter what. all of the other candidates are professional politicians clearly in it for themselves. they would do anything just to get the vote, and it makes me sick. who else can say all this? He has never voted to raise taxes. He has never voted for an unbalanced budget. He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership. He has never voted to raise congressional pay. He has never taken a government-paid junket. He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch. He voted against the Patriot Act. He voted against regulating the Internet. He voted against the Iraq war. He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program. He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year. Congressman Paul introduces numerous pieces of substantive legislation each year, probably more than any single member of Congress. This post has been edited by celicaST: Dec 23, 2007 - 4:59 AM -------------------- I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry. And that's extra scary to me, because there's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside. |
|
Dec 23, 2007 - 2:33 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast Joined Jun 19, '06 From Portland, OR Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) |
-------------------- 87 4runner DLX 22re, 5spd, 4.30gr, 4" lift, 30" tires, HID w/ Projectors, 6spkr + sub, custom exhaust, 94 celica leather seats, SR5 gauge cluster and clinometer. Future engine swap... possibly a 2jzge.
|
 |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: June 26th, 2025 - 12:19 PM |