![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Apr 15, '07 From Fort Worth, TX Currently Offline Reputation: 12 (100%) ![]() |
Am I the only one that feels the signature limits are WAY too strict? I can't even make a picture that is 20kb without it looking like crap. At least allow a quarter of a MB, this isn't big at all, and takes most connections only a second to load. And I can't say anything good about the 125px height limit, either. I say bump that up to 175-200px.
-Matt |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 13, '06 From UK Currently Offline Reputation: 6 (100%) ![]() |
Do you have Photoshop?
If so, use the 'save for web' option to drop the file size, easy to get under 20Kb. I think the height limit is about right, i have mine a little smaller at 400x100 it's a PITA to have to scroll down through a bunch of huge sig pics ![]() -------------------- |
![]() |
|
![]() Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 23, '02 From Seattle, WA Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) ![]() |
I agree with manphibian on this, it's quite easy to make a file under 20kb look good. No-one wants to load 20 signatures at 250kb a piece. That's 5mb worth of signature images!
And the height is so that we don't have to scroll through tons of tall images when browsing threads. ![]() -------------------- New Toyota project coming soon...
|
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Dec 21, '06 From New Zealand Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
My scroll wheel will murder you in the night for even suggesting such a thing!
![]() This post has been edited by MercuryFree: Jul 20, 2008 - 4:30 PM -------------------- |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: July 19th, 2025 - 3:26 AM |