![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast Joined Oct 17, '05 From Tucson, AZ Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
Is there any positive experience with these types of mufflers? I know most go with the straight through design, but I know they would be way too loud and not sound the way I would like. I also was considering this because I don't want to lose any low end power by getting a straight through design. Low end is much more important then high end to me. I was thinking about looking into a Dynomax Super Turbo or possibly a Flowmaster. Any input is appreciated.
http://www.dynomax.com/superturbo.stm |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Feb 11, '08 From Auckland, New Zealand Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
i wish someone would eliminate the term back pressure.
back pressure is bad, back pressure belongs to old spy movies where someone sneaks up to the tail car and rams a potato spud into the tail pipe so that it cant start. the only reason why we have exhausts is to direct noise and emissions away from the cabin. if not for that, our headers would dump out the side of the car. pulse extraction and scavenging are features of specially designed systems which may look like they impede flow, but actually assist in power production (or rather minimise loss of power due to manditory exhaust system) but DO NOT call this back pressure. say if you get airbourne and land on your front pipe and squash it... theres your ever so valuable back pressure... go jump on a dyno and collect ur extra 20hp. -------------------- Mike W
1996 Toyota Celica ST205 GT-FOUR GT2860RS turbine, TiAL mvr44, JE 86.5φ piston, Clutchmasters FX400, APEX P-FC 269awhp / 273ft-lbs |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: September 22nd, 2025 - 1:16 PM |