![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Feb 1, '05 From Charlotte NC Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) ![]() |
Hey guys figured this would get your panties in a bunch.... I read this article in the Q&A section of Import tuner magazine earlier this year or sometime last year. I almost unsubscribed after this.
DISCUSS! http://www.importtuner.com/tech/impp_1206_...stions_answers/ -------------------- |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 22, '03 From NOVA Currently Offline Reputation: 16 (100%) ![]() |
I'm going to disagree with your belt vs chain arguement, as chain is better for higher RPMS, more durable and less maintenance....sooo if you're going to drift a chain is safer than a belt. Chains are less likely to jump teeth, shred parts and are more rugid. Belts are rip/tear/shred and require replacing.
3s is expensive for a reason......cause nobody keeps them around except a select few. not because its the ****; no supply cause no demand. Not to mention they only came in 2 cars......from the 1990s (or earlier) in the US. Cast iron is stronger can also be argued as the 3s has a tendancy to crack blocks and run a cylinder lean. A sleeved aluminum block that is properly tuned is just as good if not better....Tell me when you last saw a cast iron block in a supercar? saying better with no real information is weaksauce |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: August 22nd, 2025 - 8:52 AM |