6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> GT or ST
post Oct 6, 2014 - 5:28 PM
+Quote Post
AustenJoe12



Enthusiast
*
Joined Jan 16, '14
From Boise, Idaho
Currently Offline

Reputation: 1 (100%)




Hey guys, I've been a part of this forum for a while, I have a 95 GT auto and I just recently found a 95 ST that has less mileage than mine (125k compared to my 225k) and it is also a manual. I was just wondering if there are any ST owners out there who have owned both the ST and GT or have compared both. Is it worth dropping down to a ST model. I like the fact that this ST I'm thinking about purchasing is a manual and has 100k less miles than mine but I just wanna get some advice from some of you guys. Should I keep my auto GT or would i be better off with the manual ST. Any advice would be appreciated.


Thanks guys.


--------------------
"I'd rather lose by a mile because I built my own car than win by an inch because someone else built it for me"





 
Start new topic
Replies
post Oct 7, 2014 - 12:07 AM
+Quote Post
SwissFerdi

Enthusiast
*****
Joined Jun 18, '09
From Orlando
Currently Offline

Reputation: 8 (100%)




The only way to certainly know is to test drive it. I like the ST's lower weight, it feels better on turn-in. However, I feel like the GT's gain makes it feel a little more stable when the suspension and body start leaning.

This post has been edited by SwissFerdi: Oct 7, 2014 - 12:07 AM


--------------------
'97 ST \ Eibach \ KYB \ Kenwood \ Alpine \ Cusco \ OEM+ [sold 10/18]
'93 MX-5 LE

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: July 17th, 2025 - 9:09 PM