![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() Joined Jan 16, '14 From Boise, Idaho Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
Hey guys, I've been a part of this forum for a while, I have a 95 GT auto and I just recently found a 95 ST that has less mileage than mine (125k compared to my 225k) and it is also a manual. I was just wondering if there are any ST owners out there who have owned both the ST and GT or have compared both. Is it worth dropping down to a ST model. I like the fact that this ST I'm thinking about purchasing is a manual and has 100k less miles than mine but I just wanna get some advice from some of you guys. Should I keep my auto GT or would i be better off with the manual ST. Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks guys. -------------------- "I'd rather lose by a mile because I built my own car than win by an inch because someone else built it for me"
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jun 18, '09 From Orlando Currently Offline Reputation: 8 (100%) ![]() |
The only way to certainly know is to test drive it. I like the ST's lower weight, it feels better on turn-in. However, I feel like the GT's gain makes it feel a little more stable when the suspension and body start leaning.
This post has been edited by SwissFerdi: Oct 7, 2014 - 12:07 AM -------------------- '97 ST \ Eibach \ KYB \ Kenwood \ Alpine \ Cusco \ OEM+ [sold 10/18]
'93 MX-5 LE |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: July 17th, 2025 - 9:09 PM |