Frs or nd miata Options

[Jmk91]

I'm looking for a non bias opinion on what car I should choose... I'll be buying one within the next year. Fixing a few hick ups on my credit currently I'm not paying 12% Apr... so if you had to choose what one would it be? The frs isn't really even a Toyota it's a subie so junk paint and the fa20 had a bunch of issues with first year models 2013s. Mazda on the other hand always failed the first time with the new model miata.. na the 1.6 sucked and no torsen. First 2 years of the nb had engine issues. The first 3 years of the nc had junk suspension (soft) and weak internals that where later replaced with forged. I think the miata will hold its value much better and probably better quality... but the frs has much more sex appeal. Both are in same price range. .. the miata is faster but has a 13:1 compression... the frs engines bend rods(often reported kinda a ticking time bomb once you add boost but that's almost any car) after 250whp. My goal is roughly 250whp maybe 275 tops. So if you had to choose what one and explain why.

[Jmk91]

The vlsd doesn't last, many people reported it fails at or around 60k miles than turns into an open dif. I had a 1990 I paid 1500 for it. The 1.6 is overly built so it does handle boost rather well. It can handle 210whp roughly. The 94-97 na has more bracing and better engine and stronger rear end. I can't find any decent ones around here what so ever. Best time to buy a miata is winter time but no luck. Also the s2000 is another beast I'd love to own it. But have you ever priced a hardtop for a s2000? 2-3k! That's crazy