 Super Strut vs MacPherson |
 Nov 9, 2004 - 11:34 PM
|
 
|
|
Enthusiast  Joined Apr 24, '04 From S. Cali Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%)  |
What is the difference between the Super Strut suspension on the SS-III and the MacPherson on my GT. Which one is better and can they be swapped??
|
 |
Replies
|
Nov 10, 2004 - 2:17 PM
|
|
||||
|
Enthusiast Joined Nov 25, '03 From Mizzeri Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Yes, it would need to be aligned. The odds of swapping out your whole suspension and putting another one in its place and somehow hitting upon perfect alignment upon assembly is pretty slim.
Well, yes and no. The camber setting will always remain constant; however, the toe settings may need to be changed, and the caster settings might as well. In fact (and I don't know this to be true) it is possible that while the camber settings remain static, the toe and/or caster may change under load. My point was simply that it was designed for use in WRC, and they abandoned it. Seems to me like its not something I want on my car. Sounds like it was a good theory that didn't work in practice. |
||||
Posts in this topic
Davesceli Super Strut vs MacPherson Nov 9, 2004 - 11:34 PM
Consynx takes a lot of work, extra brake lines and such(i ... Nov 10, 2004 - 12:50 PM ConeTrouble QUOTE (Consynx @ Nov 10, 2004 - 5:50 PM)the s... Nov 10, 2004 - 2:04 PM Consynx would it really need aligned then?
by your stateme... Nov 10, 2004 - 2:07 PM Consynx yet all the good coil-overs are for the superstrut... Nov 10, 2004 - 2:19 PM racingmcfly Well i might be able to tell you soon, the differe... Nov 10, 2004 - 2:35 PM
Mr_E QUOTE(racingmcfly @ Nov 10, 2004 - 2:35 PM) 2... Nov 16, 2004 - 7:53 PM racingmcfly PIcked up the st202, and msut say, it handles very... Nov 24, 2004 - 1:30 PM Mr_E Sounds cool mate. Nov 25, 2004 - 6:36 AM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: March 28th, 2026 - 4:13 PM |