Nov 21, 2004 - 2:48 AM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Feb 16, '04 From San Diego Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Recently /.ed article. Black boxes in new cars huh? Sounds worse than the anti-crime cameras they put all over Oceania... I mean the UK.
http://www.cars.com/news/stories/111604_storyb_an.jhtml -------------------- ![]() |
![]() |
Nov 21, 2004 - 3:04 AM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Feb 16, '04 From San Diego Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
1. The oft-used slippery-slope argument.
2. F ups in the system. (Hence the 1984 reference). 3. Corporations getting ahold of such information (insurance companies, etc.). Like having a black box in your car. I'm sure it reduces speeding quite a bit, but if your auto insurance company knows that you have a tendency to brake hard, finding a cheap rate could be difficult. -------------------- ![]() |
mr_dude Big Brother Nov 21, 2004 - 2:48 AM
Uppitycracker Hey man why should you be worried about public cam... Nov 21, 2004 - 2:54 AM
Uppitycracker QUOTE(mr_dude @ Nov 21, 2004 - 1:04 AM)1.... Nov 21, 2004 - 4:03 AM
carb0n_f1b3r [QUOTE]Uppitycracker Posted Yesterday, 07:54 AM
... Nov 21, 2004 - 7:53 PM
Coomer Man, that article is scary. Nov 21, 2004 - 8:38 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 21st, 2025 - 10:48 PM |