6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Big Brother, Under the hood
post Nov 21, 2004 - 2:48 AM
+Quote Post
mr_dude



Enthusiast
***
Joined Feb 16, '04
From San Diego
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Recently /.ed article. Black boxes in new cars huh? Sounds worse than the anti-crime cameras they put all over Oceania... I mean the UK.

http://www.cars.com/news/stories/111604_storyb_an.jhtml



--------------------
user posted image
 
Start new topic
Replies
post Nov 21, 2004 - 3:04 AM
+Quote Post
mr_dude



Enthusiast
***
Joined Feb 16, '04
From San Diego
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




1. The oft-used slippery-slope argument.
2. F ups in the system. (Hence the 1984 reference).
3. Corporations getting ahold of such information (insurance companies, etc.).

Like having a black box in your car. I'm sure it reduces speeding quite a bit, but if your auto insurance company knows that you have a tendency to brake hard, finding a cheap rate could be difficult.


--------------------
user posted image
post Nov 21, 2004 - 4:03 AM
+Quote Post
Uppitycracker



Enthusiast
****
Joined Jul 12, '03
From Chatham, Ont
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE(mr_dude @ Nov 21, 2004 - 1:04 AM)
1.  The oft-used slippery-slope argument.
2.  F ups in the system.  (Hence the 1984 reference).
3.  Corporations getting ahold of such information (insurance companies, etc.).

Like having a black box in your car.  I'm sure it reduces speeding quite a bit, but if your auto insurance company knows that you have a tendency to brake hard, finding a cheap rate could be difficult.
[right][snapback]209704[/snapback][/right]

I can understand the argument against the auto one, but not really the public camera, though the arguments against both are one in the same, protecting your right to break the law wink.gif

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: November 21st, 2025 - 9:29 PM