![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Sep 4, '03 From Twin Cities MN Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) ![]() |
So today me and a bud we arguing back and forth over which car is a better overall package... i said the 4th gen prelude (92-96) because of the SI's 2.3 and its broad powerband, the 4WS model and its super sharp handling characteristics (sp), and of course the VETEC model and its hyper-output... My friend, on the other hand, insisted that the weight saved from the integra (94-01) would out-perform the prelude anyday and that there also was vetec in the GSR's, to in wich i said the prelude had WAY more torque... with aftermarket for these cars though, im unsure how the tide will fall. Next to the Type R integra, i think the Prelude still is superior, and since the type R is super rare its really not a true comparison... GSR VS VETEC I think the Prelude is nicer... and LS VS SI prelude hands down... so what do you all think?
This post has been edited by saleeka: Jan 19, 2005 - 2:59 AM -------------------- Car #3: 98 Accord LX- purchased 5/06, totaled 8/06
Car #2: 95 Celica GT- purchased 8/03, current daily driver Car #1: 01 Focus ZX3- purchased 5/01, sold 8/03 |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jul 12, '03 From Chatham, Ont Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
4th gen preludes are sex man. Its one of my top choices for a next car. It goes 7th gen gts > mr2t > 4th gen prelude si or vtec.
Im not really sure about the better performer but I like the prelude better out of the 2 because integras are sooooo common and the lude just looks so much sexier. Tim This post has been edited by Uppitycracker: Jan 19, 2005 - 3:08 AM |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: September 10th, 2025 - 2:42 PM |