Feb 8, 2005 - 7:14 PM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jul 12, '03 From Chatham, Ont Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Playstation 3 processor and new PC processor competitor.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4242447.stm Tim This post has been edited by Uppitycracker: Feb 8, 2005 - 7:14 PM |
![]() |
Feb 8, 2005 - 10:59 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Nov 14, '04 Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
it is impossible to compare a console cpu to a comp cpu due to several things (only exception is the xbox which was essentialy a celeron).
1. No cross platform benchmarking software 2. Difference in clock speeds actual power ie compare an intel to an amd and you will find the amd stomps intels right now with alot lower clock speeds. Any questions? Amd already is in line to release multi core cpu's next year and last I heard intel would follow soon after. |
Feb 9, 2005 - 1:46 AM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jul 12, '03 From Chatham, Ont Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(SinisterWhisper @ Feb 8, 2005 - 8:59 PM) it is impossible to compare a console cpu to a comp cpu due to several things (only exception is the xbox which was essentialy a celeron). 1. No cross platform benchmarking software 2. Difference in clock speeds actual power ie compare an intel to an amd and you will find the amd stomps intels right now with alot lower clock speeds. Any questions? Amd already is in line to release multi core cpu's next year and last I heard intel would follow soon after. [right][snapback]243692[/snapback][/right] It all depends on your type of computing. The amd64 may perform better in benchmarks. But try multitasking like you can with a p4ht and its not going to happen. I have multiple programs running all the time without slowing down each other. Thats much better then some trivial benchmark number. And if you read the article, the chip is going to be used for PC's aswell. Tim This post has been edited by Uppitycracker: Feb 9, 2005 - 1:49 AM |
Uppitycracker I know what my next computer is running Feb 8, 2005 - 7:14 PM
Anub1s holy chit I hope they come out with that to the pu... Feb 8, 2005 - 8:10 PM
Andason intel = pwnt Feb 8, 2005 - 8:51 PM
946thGenGT You guys really don't think that Intel or AMD ... Feb 8, 2005 - 10:01 PM
Uppitycracker QUOTE(946thGenGT @ Feb 8, 2005 - 8:01 PM)You ... Feb 9, 2005 - 1:50 AM
mr_dude Better learn whatever Linux or OS distro IBM is us... Feb 8, 2005 - 10:29 PM
WannabeGT4 QUOTE(mr_dude @ Feb 8, 2005 - 9:29 PM)Better ... Feb 8, 2005 - 11:13 PM
WannabeGT4 QUOTE(SinisterWhisper @ Feb 8, 2005 - 9:59 PM... Feb 8, 2005 - 11:18 PM
Supersprynt Well lets see how high we can drive up the price f... Feb 8, 2005 - 11:55 PM
mr_dude QUOTE"laughable" eh? They sure churned o... Feb 9, 2005 - 1:11 AM
SinisterWhisper intels have always been better at numbers while am... Feb 9, 2005 - 6:43 AM
turboinduction I'll wait for Intel's chip. Figuring they... Feb 9, 2005 - 9:14 AM
lagos the problem with these cell chips is that the app ... Feb 9, 2005 - 2:43 PM
WannabeGT4 Link from article posted above:
http://news.bbc.co... Feb 9, 2005 - 4:27 PM
SinisterWhisper umm ps2 is behind the pack when it comes to power ... Feb 9, 2005 - 6:50 PM
pr_caralho I dont know exactly what the deal with halo was, I... Feb 9, 2005 - 10:30 PM
Sev408 i heard the other day that cpus are getting to the... Feb 10, 2005 - 12:59 AM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 22nd, 2025 - 12:35 AM |