Feb 20, 2005 - 3:31 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() Joined Jul 4, '04 From 626 Ca Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
2 different cars w/ very similar bite. now i'd like to see what the 6th genners think..if you had to choose, which 1 would it be? and why?
EDIT: US specs This post has been edited by RyCeCuBe: Feb 20, 2005 - 5:45 PM |
![]() |
Feb 21, 2005 - 1:37 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 30, '02 From Anaheim, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(SlowCelica94 @ Feb 20, 2005 - 9:06 PM) EVO. Mitsu has some little bugs due to poor quality, but nothing I'll lose sleep over. The subby has a horrible tranny and doesnt like to hold to warranty. But neither does. [right][snapback]248378[/snapback][/right] STI does not have a transmission failure rate anywhere near that of a normal WRX yes, both love voiding warranties, but in most cases, they are in the right. my WRX is probably making 325 crank hp now. a 45% increase in power puts plenty of extra stress on every part of the drivetrain people say mitsu has reps go to 1/4 mile tracks and take down licence plates of EVO's that are racing just to void warranties. i find that kinda funny RyCeCuBe it depends on what you want. STI feels like it has more power, due to the torque and the bigger displacment. EVO handles better IMO, the interior of the evo looks and feels cheap(except the seats) other than that, the cars are designed to compete with eachother, and are based off of race cars with specific requirements This post has been edited by 97sccelica: Feb 21, 2005 - 1:43 AM -------------------- 1994 Celica GT4 WRC Edition
@gt4.wrc on Instagram |
RyCeCuBe evo8 MR or wrx STi? Feb 20, 2005 - 3:31 PM
Mr_E Depends what spec the WRX and Evo are.
I'd ta... Feb 20, 2005 - 3:37 PM
LewFX I neighbors friend of mine has the evo, ordered it... Feb 20, 2005 - 3:44 PM
Digndoug STI cause mitsu are junk Feb 20, 2005 - 4:02 PM
95gtschick sti... because i've wanted one forever Feb 20, 2005 - 4:17 PM
crazycel18 id go evo mr but ive wnated an eveo forever Feb 20, 2005 - 4:51 PM
brianforster sti because mitsubishi didn't learn how to bui... Feb 20, 2005 - 7:00 PM
macavely Evo but not the MR .... its just that much after t... Feb 20, 2005 - 7:43 PM
97sccelica i'd take the STI
there's something about ... Feb 20, 2005 - 9:48 PM
SlowCelica94 EVO. Mitsu has some little bugs due to poor qualit... Feb 21, 2005 - 12:06 AM
Bigmeanbulldog55 I'd take the STI. The STI has a 60/40 torque ... Feb 21, 2005 - 12:22 AM
RyCeCuBe too bad, i can't say i testdrove both of em...... Feb 21, 2005 - 12:48 AM
Supersprynt I've driven a regular Evo, not the MR. In Car... Feb 22, 2005 - 9:23 AM
97sccelica QUOTE(Supersprynt @ Feb 22, 2005 - 6:23 AM)I... Feb 22, 2005 - 2:20 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: October 27th, 2025 - 6:08 PM |