![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Mar 8, '04 From Newport, RI Currently Offline Reputation: 63 (99%) ![]() |
maybe it's just me but I think I have seen more posts about GT having more probs than STs. Am I just imagining it ?
I know they are both some of the most reliable engines ever, but, which is more reliable long term ? My opinion is that GT owners have most likely driven their cars harder (more wear and tear) than ST owners. If your car has the power you are more likely to use it more often. People with a 7a probably aren't going to push it because, well, they aren't going to get the results they want and probably accept it. I think you are more likely to find a more abused GT than an ST. If you find a babied GT or a babied ST, which would last longer ? what do you all think ? -------------------- |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Nov 4, '02 From Hecho en la Republica Dominicana/Living in NJ Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
well just got back from a 700 mile road trip... and push the ship out of the 5s ... she reached speeds of 90-125 for a good hour none stop.... and has 216,030 miles on the block and head.... no major engine problems yet... other then the other night she not wanting to start cause of a frozen fuel filter... also had the 7a as some of u might remeber with 180,xxx miles on it... and never had one single problem with that engine ... so which one is more reliable.... well thats which everone u are driving and taking care of...
-------------------- |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: June 6th, 2025 - 1:30 PM |