more reliable : GT or ST ?, probably been coverd before... Options

[Batman722]

maybe it's just me but I think I have seen more posts about GT having more probs than STs. Am I just imagining it ?

I know they are both some of the most reliable engines ever, but, which is more reliable long term ?

My opinion is that GT owners have most likely driven their cars harder (more wear and tear) than ST owners. If your car has the power you are more likely to use it more often. People with a 7a probably aren't going to push it because, well, they aren't going to get the results they want and probably accept it. I think you are more likely to find a more abused GT than an ST.

If you find a babied GT or a babied ST, which would last longer ?

what do you all think ?

[Digndoug]

I think there all the same.. But it all depends on the drivers of the cars, and the care. If you dont take care of an engine or car, it could crap out around 80k. ... if you do take care of it, it could crap out at 260k or somthing stupid like that.

I think sence there both low power economy engines and not made to run hard.. they will last a long time.