6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> more reliable : GT or ST ?, probably been coverd before...
post Mar 5, 2005 - 12:15 AM
+Quote Post
Batman722



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Mar 8, '04
From Newport, RI
Currently Offline

Reputation: 63 (99%)




maybe it's just me but I think I have seen more posts about GT having more probs than STs. Am I just imagining it ?

I know they are both some of the most reliable engines ever, but, which is more reliable long term ?

My opinion is that GT owners have most likely driven their cars harder (more wear and tear) than ST owners. If your car has the power you are more likely to use it more often. People with a 7a probably aren't going to push it because, well, they aren't going to get the results they want and probably accept it. I think you are more likely to find a more abused GT than an ST.

If you find a babied GT or a babied ST, which would last longer ?

what do you all think ?


--------------------
 
Start new topic
Replies
post Mar 6, 2005 - 6:05 PM
+Quote Post
pokemeintheeye

Enthusiast
**
Joined Sep 27, '04
From Minnesota
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




I'm gonna have to agree with Insanity-74. Most drivers are more likely to drive an underpowered car a lot more aggressively do to its lack of power to reach the desired speed.

I'll say this too. Leaving the engine out of it. The top of line model celica will have more problems than the base model celica. The only reason thats true is because the one has more gadgets and options than the other.

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: November 22nd, 2025 - 5:25 AM