![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Administrator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 23, '02 From Seattle, WA Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) ![]() |
It's gone, for the time being...signatures are being reformed so that we no longer have to suffer through waiting for everyone's large signature images to load. In the near future(hopefully later today), images will no longer be allowed in signatures.
Avatar settings have changed to allow for images up to 90x70 pixels, rather than the smaller 64 x64, but animations are still not allowed. Feel free to discuss here in this thread. I'll go into my reasons for this if you guys want. -------------------- New Toyota project coming soon...
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 29, '02 From Franklin/Nashville, TN Currently Offline Reputation: 16 (100%) ![]() |
...why not just put a restriction on the size?
no image sigs is pretty lame...i mean, people with slow connections can complain all day about having to wait, but then again, people with fast connections that it doesn't bother can complain about not being able to have them. iono, just my opinion, but it really doesn't matter. i just think the size should be restricted, instead of just taking them completely away altogether. i mean, i understand it's your site and everything, but you didn't even take other people's opinions, such as even discussing it in the mod forum. unless you're doing this because of a couple posts in the sig thread here in the web discussion forum, this is basically out of the blue. please post your reasons, i'm sure others will want to see them, besides myself. because i think it's unnecessary. it's not our fault some people have sub-par internet connections, i dont' tink you should have to cater to their out-dated services. -John- -------------------- |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: July 29th, 2025 - 12:17 PM |