 Where Did Your Sig Go? |
 Mar 8, 2005 - 4:16 PM
|
 
|
 Administrator  Joined Aug 23, '02 From Seattle, WA Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%)  |
It's gone, for the time being...signatures are being reformed so that we no longer have to suffer through waiting for everyone's large signature images to load. In the near future(hopefully later today), images will no longer be allowed in signatures.
Avatar settings have changed to allow for images up to 90x70 pixels, rather than the smaller 64 x64, but animations are still not allowed. Feel free to discuss here in this thread. I'll go into my reasons for this if you guys want. -------------------- New Toyota project coming soon...
|
 |
Replies
|
Mar 10, 2005 - 9:06 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Mar 18, '04 From Portland OR / Vancouver WA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
QUOTE(Coomer @ Mar 8, 2005 - 1:16 PM) Avatar settings have changed to allow for images up to 90x70 pixels, rather than the smaller 64 x64, but animations are still not allowed. [right][snapback]254705[/snapback][/right] I may have skipped over this or something....sorry if I did (im at work)...but what happened to having the larger Avatars??? Was that idea X'd now that we get to have pics in our sigs again??? --------------------  |
Posts in this topic
Coomer Where Did Your Sig Go? Mar 8, 2005 - 4:16 PM
Mynzeyes ...why not just put a restriction on the size?
n... Mar 8, 2005 - 6:04 PM dstrbcelica i agree with john. i want my image sig. back. why... Mar 8, 2005 - 6:06 PM CelicaBuddy Yea.... me too
I liked my signiture thing... I do... Mar 8, 2005 - 6:09 PM Jen I definitely (also) agree with John.
Why do peopl... Mar 8, 2005 - 6:13 PM Coomer 1. Signature images are distracting, and they take... Mar 8, 2005 - 6:22 PM
Mynzeyes 1. Signature images are distracting, and they take... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:12 PM Consynx hmmm :\
my antidrug is gone...i'm now liv... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:02 PM Andason i think a banner type thing should be allowed... b... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:03 PM Coomer QUOTE(Andason @ Mar 8, 2005 - 4:03 PM)i think... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:05 PM Andason QUOTE(Andason @ Mar 8, 2005 - 6:03 PM)i think... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:15 PM madmods I'd be down for just a small pic. I'm not ... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:16 PM Supersprynt How are signatures distracting? We arent fish in a... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:18 PM Coomer I wouldn't consider some of your points valid ... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:20 PM Mynzeyes QUOTE(Coomer @ Mar 8, 2005 - 6:20 PM)John, wo... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:25 PM Coomer QUOTE(Mynzeyes @ Mar 8, 2005 - 4:25 PM)QUOTE(... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:34 PM shid QUOTE(Coomer @ Mar 9, 2005 - 12:34 AM)QUOTE(M... Mar 8, 2005 - 8:17 PM Consynx one more thing, clicking on names doesn't have... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:21 PM shid Coomer, people's sigs are how I quickly visual... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:30 PM Consynx i'll be a mod to help enforce new avatars Mar 8, 2005 - 7:30 PM Supersprynt How do you view a profile? I get this middle scree... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:33 PM defgeph QUOTE(Supersprynt @ Mar 8, 2005 - 7:18 PM)I t... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:37 PM Consynx hey, DSL isn't avail yet at this house, and ne... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:41 PM defgeph QUOTE(Consynx @ Mar 8, 2005 - 7:41 PM)hey, DS... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:42 PM Coomer QUOTE(Consynx @ Mar 8, 2005 - 4:41 PM)hey, DS... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:50 PM pr_caralho QUOTE(Coomer @ Mar 8, 2005 - 4:16 PM)It's... Mar 8, 2005 - 7:57 PM Coomer Well you guys just need to hold on for a couple da... Mar 8, 2005 - 8:01 PM defgeph You also have the option of turning off signatures... Mar 8, 2005 - 8:04 PM Akimbo Agreed. More moderation.
I am for bringing sigs b... Mar 8, 2005 - 8:35 PM chucho ya its a car site. & i definitely enjoy seein... Mar 8, 2005 - 8:43 PM Supersprynt Are the avatars back to 64x64 cuz they wont work a... Mar 8, 2005 - 8:55 PM Coomer QUOTE(Supersprynt @ Mar 8, 2005 - 5:55 PM)Are... Mar 8, 2005 - 9:06 PM Drocay o, and you say that the sigs are distracting but t... Mar 9, 2005 - 12:21 AM Coomer They're back! Mar 9, 2005 - 1:30 AM Mynzeyes wewt. Mar 9, 2005 - 1:52 AM Batman722 fo shizzle Mar 9, 2005 - 1:53 AM doGGy What size max can be used now?
350x120 will be ok... Mar 9, 2005 - 1:57 AM Mynzeyes QUOTE(doGGy @ Mar 9, 2005 - 12:57 AM)What siz... Mar 9, 2005 - 1:58 AM Supersprynt I gotta ask, can the minimum be raised to like 22k... Mar 9, 2005 - 1:59 AM doGGy if you saving with photoshop, use Save Fr WEB func... Mar 9, 2005 - 2:11 AM Mynzeyes try a .png file. that should work, and the quality... Mar 9, 2005 - 2:06 AM Supersprynt .png triples the KB. Whats aggravating is that I... Mar 9, 2005 - 2:17 AM Drocay yea, how are u guys getting your sigs to change si... Mar 9, 2005 - 2:18 AM Supersprynt The sizes of the images arent a problem but im ser... Mar 9, 2005 - 2:23 AM doGGy Super, did you tryed Save For Web?
QUOTE(Supersp... Mar 9, 2005 - 2:25 AM Drocay yea, i was just about to say that i was messing wi... Mar 9, 2005 - 2:28 AM Coomer I used Fireworks for optimizing my JPEG images. Th... Mar 9, 2005 - 2:38 AM Supersprynt I dont have photoshop so I dont kno what save for ... Mar 9, 2005 - 2:42 AM Coomer QUOTE(Supersprynt @ Mar 8, 2005 - 11:42 PM)I ... Mar 9, 2005 - 2:43 AM Supersprynt No but Drocay was nice enough to go about fixing m... Mar 9, 2005 - 2:48 AM CheesyLobster Cooommmmm.... what the... most of the people here ... Mar 9, 2005 - 4:06 AM macavely wow i tottaly missed this discussion.. i think i m... Mar 9, 2005 - 4:30 AM gas65 Coomer, your sig is still too big, please reduce i... Mar 9, 2005 - 5:23 AM Drocay now there back to old setting and sigs are back bu... Mar 10, 2005 - 9:41 PM Tweek ok, I don't know if you solved this yet coomer... Mar 12, 2005 - 1:43 AM Tweek also, whats the final word on this? Maybe you coul... Mar 12, 2005 - 1:45 AM Coomer QUOTE(Tweek @ Mar 11, 2005 - 10:43 PM)ok, I d... Mar 12, 2005 - 6:38 AM tomazws Glad u kept the image sigs. For the most part, pe... Mar 15, 2005 - 12:26 AM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: July 29th, 2025 - 11:37 AM |