![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Mar 9, '04 From San Carlos, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 30, '02 From Anaheim, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
its not the quickest production car ever either if you consider the fact that mopar had some production cars hitting 10's in the late 60's, with out all the technology of today, namely fuel injection, forced induction, and improved tire technology.
whats that thing run on, C16? and $175k for a used car? ![]() honestly, the skyline gtr's are nice cars, but people hold them up higher than they should be This post has been edited by 97sccelica: Mar 22, 2005 - 2:58 AM -------------------- 1994 Celica GT4 WRC Edition
@gt4.wrc on Instagram |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Sep 4, '03 From Twin Cities MN Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(97sccelica @ Mar 22, 2005 - 1:40 AM) its not the quickest production car ever either if you consider the fact that mopar had some production cars hitting 10's in the late 60's[right][snapback]260544[/snapback][/right] pssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhh ok if you DO belive the factory times that they gave out, LOL, or the numbers that mags got with tuned cars claimed to be stock... I dont think any of the muscle cars could hit under 13.0 in real world time, PERIOD... -------------------- Car #3: 98 Accord LX- purchased 5/06, totaled 8/06
Car #2: 95 Celica GT- purchased 8/03, current daily driver Car #1: 01 Focus ZX3- purchased 5/01, sold 8/03 |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Dec 26, '02 From Alabama Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(saleeka @ Mar 22, 2005 - 1:04 AM) QUOTE(97sccelica @ Mar 22, 2005 - 1:40 AM) its not the quickest production car ever either if you consider the fact that mopar had some production cars hitting 10's in the late 60's[right][snapback]260544[/snapback][/right] pssssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhh ok if you DO belive the factory times that they gave out, LOL, or the numbers that mags got with tuned cars claimed to be stock... I dont think any of the muscle cars could hit under 13.0 in real world time, PERIOD... [right][snapback]260550[/snapback][/right] My VERY FAVORITE article from a car magazine was back in the late 90's when the new (then) C5 vette came out... they ran it head to head with a bone stock 1969 Vette wiith the 427 and three deuces. ![]() The 69 beat the C5 in every category but breaking and the cones. ![]() ![]() Also, Shelby was producing cars back then that would crush the 69 vette. They might not have had the tech, but they also didn't have the emissions. ![]() Jon=missing his old corvette. ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: July 22nd, 2025 - 1:03 PM |