![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast Joined Apr 7, '05 Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
I know im going to get a hugely biased opionion from this place, but im looking at getting a used car and the Mk 6 celica is the highest on my list. But when i can get a 2000 model Lancer a the same price as a 1997 celica it puts my mind into a questionable state.
Some other cars im looking at: :Honda Civic :Mazda MX6 :Honda Prelude :Nissan Pulsar :Mitsu Lancer :BMW 318i so what does the celica have over these? cheers Zoiks |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined May 7, '04 From Concord, NH Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
Don't get a celica. . save and get a supra.
Little difference here kid . 4-8K for a celica. . versus 13-25K for a supra. It's not like a couple grand more here kiddo. a little bit out of his price range Dr. This post has been edited by drnovascotia: Apr 13, 2005 - 11:57 AM |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: September 12th, 2025 - 6:17 PM |