This is just wrong, This is a rich kid for you Options

[darksecret]

This guy did this a couple of weeks ago and his parents went out and bought him a Boxter, I guess as a reward for having the car for more than a month before totaling it.


This post has been edited by darksecret: Apr 22, 2005 - 12:28 PM

[darksecret]

I know if someone that can afford a $200,000 car won't have to worry about fuel, but why can't these manufacterers quit doing the same s*** over and over again. Carbon composite bodies and sequential shift are yesterday stuff, someone with enough time and a list of formulas can come up with a 600HP V12 supercar, but why not create an electric supercharger that works or true unlimited variable valve timing, what about making a V12 with no less than 700HP in all their production cars, go all out and make a V12 that gets 40mpg, that would be a feat for Lamborghini. It's like Cadillac when they made the V16, it's 16 cylinders it should have made more than 1,000HP, there are regular cars out there that make that much power on 6 cyclinders. I once was a Ferrari fan, but whith the F40 and F50, I seen street ready "race cars" that couldn't handle for jack, i've seen trucks pull corners better than those cars, now i'll give it to the Enzo it's better and also twice the price. The great European engineering legacy died when the Mercedes and BMW lines became very common else where. I will admit that Chevy does make a cheap feeling vehicle, my Sierra felt like sitting in a tupperware container because of the cheap and huge dashboard, but I also paid $5,000 for it, and got a 350ci Vortec V8 that could easily get 19mpg if not more and could still run with a Z28.