![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 10, '03 From Wichita, KS Currently Offline Reputation: 5 (100%) ![]() |
Couple of videos in there of a 3rd gen 3s being tested with the megasquirt and spark with the Ford EDIS Iginition setup which is probably what I'll end up running on mine when ever I find some time and money to get started.
Thread: http://forums.beyond.ca/showthread.php?threadid=76455 Videos: http://www.3sgtemr2.com/gen3/IM000011.AVI http://www.3sgtemr2.com/gen3/IM000016.AVI -------------------- ![]() Project ST204.5 99.88946% complete... |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 10, '03 From Wichita, KS Currently Offline Reputation: 5 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(Kwanza26 @ May 24, 2005 - 3:09 PM) That's pretty cool... I don't see the advantage of using EDIS, since MSnS can do spark with the stock stuff also, but cool. Maybe I'll start posting pictures of my setup once It gets closer to getting done... [right][snapback]291195[/snapback][/right] I think that using EDIS would be more reliable and simpler than modifying and rewiring the old fashioned cap and rotor. Fabbing simple brackets for the crank sensor and welding a 36-1 crank trigger to the pulley is simple stuff and seems to make tuning a whole lot easier. There must be a reason newer cars are becoming distributorless. ![]() What is your setup exactly? I'm sure we'd all love to see some pics. At least you have something started. It looks like I won't be able to begin for a few more months. QUOTE(Mr_E @ May 24, 2005 - 3:34 PM) I think a 13.2 in a ST205 is going to need more like 340bhp at the fly..... [right][snapback]291203[/snapback][/right] Actually it was in a mkII MR2 which weighs about 2800 lbs so using this calculator: http://www.speedworldmotorplex.com/calc.htm It ends up being quite close to my original estimate at the fly wheel. Of course not exact but not 340. I'm sure that 340 is pretty close for a GT4 though once you factor in the added drivetrain loss and weight of 4WD. Not that 4WD is a bad thing ![]() -------------------- ![]() Project ST204.5 99.88946% complete... |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Dec 27, '03 From Nor Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
QUOTE(WannabeGT4 @ May 25, 2005 - 1:09 AM) I think that using EDIS would be more reliable and simpler than modifying and rewiring the old fashioned cap and rotor. Fabbing simple brackets for the crank sensor and welding a 36-1 crank trigger to the pulley is simple stuff and seems to make tuning a whole lot easier. There must be a reason newer cars are becoming distributorless. ![]() What is your setup exactly? I'm sure we'd all love to see some pics. At least you have something started. It looks like I won't be able to begin for a few more months. EDIS isn't the best DIS system IMO. I'd only rate it on par with with typical distributor systems because their adjustability is quite limited without a good piggyback. It's also a bit more tricky to wire up and set-up... unfortunately. But COPs and DLI and such which use different types of triggering systems are quite efficient and are better than distributor systems. My set-up... ![]() 4AG 20V silvertop rebuilt, modified, with MSnS with EDIS. I'm using EDIS because this set-up is going into an FR layout (AE86) so eliminating the distributor saves one from chopping the firewall. ;] -------------------- "It's ok to be naked girl... I'm an artist!"
1995 AT200 Celica ST: stocked out daily driver... 1984 AE86 Corolla GT-SR5: silvertop 20V 4AGE project car jacked up with goodies... 1991 SW2x MR2 n/a: bare bones hardtop model soon to be... |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: September 2nd, 2025 - 9:48 AM |