94 Gt with 5sfe turbo kit VS 1995 Gsr and RSX-S, which one will win? Options

[D-No-One]

hey there guys...Which one will wins?
i have a 1994 celica Gt with 5sfe turbo kit.
My performance Mods:
* 5sfe turbo kit
* NGK spark plugs wire
* Stage 4 clutch- Master Clutch
* K&N Intake
* Eclipse Gst fuel pump
* 430cc fuel injectors-DENSO
* Tokyo master spark plugs
* Cosmo Fuel regulator (pump at 25psi)
* Apexi super AFC
* turbo boost controller (boost at 7psi)
* TSI Intercooler
* Tunable muffler (custome catback)

1995 acura GSR:
Performance Mods:
* DC header
* Greddy evo full exhaust catback
* Reverse indiglo
* DC intake
* 10mm spark plug wires
* Skunk 2 ecu chip (RPM can rev to 10,000)

2001 AcuraN Rsx-S:
performance mods:
only have greedy air intake..


what are your best guess on who will wins this race?
also we have make some bid..i have bid 200 bucks on mine..gsr and rsx-s also bids the same as mine too...result will be post as soon as my project is done! pictures or video will be post after the race too.. http://ourrydes.point2this.com <----- my project car!! (click on chankie's Rides to see my full project pics)

[97sccelica]

QUOTE (zigy @ May 9, 2003 - 12:21 PM)

QUOTE (Supersprynt @ May 9, 2003 - 12:12 PM) The only close part is whose going to be in second, GSR or Celica. hmmm this time I'll have to give the props to CELI ... there is still some lag on the turbo with Celi but not as much noticable, while GS-Rs v-tec doesn't really start screaming till like 5200rpms... without v-tec those cars are slow, since they got NO freaken torque... *I think that Celica should pull at least 1 car length by end of the 400m (1/4 mile)

yeah, vtec makes for no low end torque. i cant stand the idea of not having power till 1/2 way to redline and even then the power isnt there till close to redline. i have been in my friends 94 gsr and it wouldnt really move until 40mph

my neighbor has a 96 gsr and when i raced him a few days ago in my auto st with just an intake, i pulled ahead from the start and at about 30mph he passed me and by 60 he was 2 car lengths ahead until we hit 90mph.

and as for the rsx-s, sure maybe car and driver's people can get 14.8's in it, but few people can drive that well. i went to the track today to watch the cars and hardly anyone there was a good driver, i saw a 6spd 2002 camaro z28 run a 16.1. that car is supposed to be in the low 14's. there was a modded celica gt-s that was in high 16's, bunch a 17 second crx's, 17 second integras. 2003 mustang cobra that ran a 15. a car is only as good as its driver lets it be.

but then a saw a 70's bug that ran 10's all day long.

also, generally when a NA engine is turboed, there is little lag in the system when the turbo is properly sized. the turbo in the burien kit is a good size and with an intercooler burien runs their celica at 12psi.

a member of celica.net with a turboed 96 st beat a new celica gt-s while at 5 psi non intercooled, then when he got an intercooler he ran 10 then 12psi and the last week he had it turbo he ran 25psi. at around 7 psi i believe he said he was on par with mustang gt's

my advice is to practice launching, it would be really bad to break the wheels loose and then have boost kick in. get sticky tires too

dont under estimate the celica. 2.2L of displacement with a turbo and even before the turbo is spooled the engine makes as much if not more torque than the rsx-s and at a lower rpm. i would be more worried about the modded gs-r with the header, catback, and intake. as for its chip, im sure it does more than remove the rev limiter, besides, there is no way any sane person would rev their car to 10,000 rpm with out some serious mods or faith