:, : Options

[97lestyousay]

:

This post has been edited by 97lestyousay: Apr 4, 2012 - 7:44 PM

[ILuvMyCelica95]

I know, my life is a friggen soap opera. My friend got drunk and decided to take on the force.  They told him when he was on his knees (6 cops) to put his face on the ground.  He replied F-U. So they sicked the dog on him.  While the dog was holding his arm on one side they put the cuff on his other hand he turned his head and bit the dog back, no sh*t.  6 cops, do they really need to sick a dog on him?
The bite got infected and he almost lost his arm. While I don't agree with my friends cop etiquite, but I still think deadly force wasn't called for.  They called it a bite and release, he said it was on his arm for 5 min.
[right][snapback]333873[/snapback][/right]

They warned him didn’t they? If he complied with that the officers asked him to do then he would not have gotten bit. He has no case that will have any standing in court, and will most likely get stuck with all the legal fees for the action if he is the one filing a complaint. If he isn’t and he thinks that because he got an infection that he is going to some way get out of it you are mistaken. You yourself even said that this man was incapacitated, I mean come on, he BIT a dog. Consequently, his testimony won’t hold any real significance in a trial inasmuch as he was obviously drunk and unruly. Being so how can he make an accurate judgment on the amount of time the dog was on his arm?

This post has been edited by ILuvMyCelica95: Sep 13, 2005 - 9:29 PM