Sep 23, 2005 - 8:44 AM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Mar 9, '05 From Charlotte Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?se...4&page_number=1
For the stock RSX owners here, unless you plan on running around at 7,000rpm I wouldn't try running the new Cobalt SS. |
![]() |
Sep 25, 2005 - 11:07 PM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Dec 27, '03 From Nor Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
Gotta understand what horsepower is before you try to make an argument on torque. Torque does mean nothing when you're trying to build a fast car and it's in the wrong rpm range (ala Toyota 5SFE)...
As for the article... remember the RSX is a 4 year old car. The Chevy cobalt is brand spanking new and is built to out compete the RSX in terms of power. I say GM got lazy and threw in an econo motor with a supercharger on it (Toyota anyone?). I'm willing to bet the RSX will still win pretty easily on a road course. Also, driving a car with torque or no torque is a matter of taste. A big torque car won't neccesarily turn everyone's clock, on the other hand, driving a high rpm car might not generate enough neck jerking force for others. Sometimes people just prefer instant thrust when they smash the throttle, but that comes at the cost of top-end pull... while other folk prefer screaming top-end power and are willing to achieve this at the cost of low-end grunt. All a matter of taste... and one being faster than the other depends on greater variables than how much power such and such makes and how much torque such and such makes... -------------------- "It's ok to be naked girl... I'm an artist!"
1995 AT200 Celica ST: stocked out daily driver... 1984 AE86 Corolla GT-SR5: silvertop 20V 4AGE project car jacked up with goodies... 1991 SW2x MR2 n/a: bare bones hardtop model soon to be... |
darksecret If anyone tells you torque doesn't mean anything Sep 23, 2005 - 8:44 AM
Akimbo a greddy turbo kit will solve that. Sep 23, 2005 - 3:07 PM
darksecret Yeah but this is stock for stock, tuning the Cobal... Sep 23, 2005 - 3:28 PM
Consynx eh, cobalt is all right
i'd def take a RSX ove... Sep 23, 2005 - 3:39 PM
darksecret Yeah it suprised me also, especially seeing how th... Sep 23, 2005 - 3:45 PM
FallenHero well, lets face it, while the SS looks like a chev... Sep 25, 2005 - 4:22 PM
ArizonaRed does anybody know what the Scion Tc will put out w... Sep 25, 2005 - 4:36 PM
FallenHero turbocharged,,, another supercharger... put NOS on... Sep 25, 2005 - 4:46 PM
Galcobar The funny thing is, horsepower is a calculation ba... Sep 25, 2005 - 5:10 PM
darksecret Yeah weight, traction, blah, blah, blah even R... Sep 26, 2005 - 9:40 AM
Kwanza26 QUOTE(darksecret @ Sep 26, 2005 - 2:40 PM)Yea... Sep 26, 2005 - 7:58 PM
bonzaisushi K series motor is an incredible motor built by hon... Sep 26, 2005 - 12:54 PM
FallenHero QUOTE(bonzaisushi @ Sep 26, 2005 - 10:54 AM)K... Sep 26, 2005 - 5:57 PM
97sccelica i'd take a cobalt SS/SC over an RSX type S any... Sep 26, 2005 - 1:15 PM
ArizonaRed i think chevy cavalier/ pontiac sunfire is garbage... Sep 26, 2005 - 2:13 PM
darksecret Yeah the Ecotec sucks huh, tell that to John Linge... Sep 26, 2005 - 7:47 PM
Kwanza26 QUOTE(darksecret @ Sep 27, 2005 - 12:47 AM)Ye... Sep 26, 2005 - 8:05 PM
Consynx only thing i see a SC being better than a turbo on... Sep 26, 2005 - 8:56 PM
FallenHero QUOTE(Consynx @ Sep 26, 2005 - 6:56 PM)only t... Sep 27, 2005 - 2:08 AM
darksecret Good point Kwanza, but remember the SS does have a... Sep 27, 2005 - 9:22 AM
Kwanza26 QUOTE(darksecret @ Sep 27, 2005 - 2:22 PM)You... Sep 27, 2005 - 10:47 AM
FallenHero GM makes plenty of performance Na engines.... they... Sep 27, 2005 - 1:11 PM
darksecret Of course they never bothered with fours until the... Sep 27, 2005 - 1:16 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: January 11th, 2026 - 6:11 PM |