![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Mar 9, '05 From Charlotte Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp?se...4&page_number=1
For the stock RSX owners here, unless you plan on running around at 7,000rpm I wouldn't try running the new Cobalt SS. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Dec 25, '02 From Pittsburgh/Clairton, PA Currently Offline Reputation: 1 (100%) ![]() |
only thing i see a SC being better than a turbo on the track is the starting 0-60, and maybe a hairpin if both ars are FF and have to slow way down.
boo SS. i'm impressed w/ what's been done to them, but not the way them and the SRT-4s were thrown into the market. 2.4L making 220hp or w/e...come on at least beat the 100hp/Liter in this day and age. -------------------- ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Dec 26, '02 From Alabama Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(Consynx @ Sep 26, 2005 - 6:56 PM) only thing i see a SC being better than a turbo on the track is the starting 0-60, and maybe a hairpin if both ars are FF and have to slow way down. boo SS. i'm impressed w/ what's been done to them, but not the way them and the SRT-4s were thrown into the market. 2.4L making 220hp or w/e...come on at least beat the 100hp/Liter in this day and age. [right][snapback]338580[/snapback][/right] are you talking about the SRT-4 engine? man, nobody here doubts it beastily power and Rompin Stompin torque. |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: July 26th, 2025 - 5:51 AM |