VR-4, 300zx, and evo8, VS. a modded to heck GT-4.. who wins? Options

[x_itchy_b_x]

yeah my friend is buying a 93 VR-4, and my other friend is getting a 2004-5 aint sure. evolution 8. thes are faast. so could a modded 3s-gte keep up? some how?

[zigy]

wow such a random numbers....what are u guys smoking?? (must be some good ****, hook me up)

(check http://www.car-stats.com for more info)

1)

I believe that we are talking about 3sgte engine swap (not actual st205),
lot of people say that FF Celica w/3sgte is faster but thats not really true....
The reason why it's not true is st205 is awd, has a lot better launch; I'm not
sure if you guys have ever been in FF car with 300hp (ex 95-99 Eclipse GST - not GSX)
there is so much wheel-hop and burned rubber that's not even funny!!! NO TRACTION...

*Of the rolling start FF would be faster but NOT from a dead stop....

2) ----Second of all...the stats for the following cars.... ARE !!!!---


*** 3000GT VR-4 (V6, TwinTurbo w/AWD)
1/4 Mile @ 13.7 (www.car-stats.com)

*** 300ZX 2-2 (V6, TwinTurbo w/RearWheelDrive)
1/4 Mile @ 13.7 (SportCompact Car, 2003)

*** RX-7 (Rotary Engine, Turbo, w/RearWheelDrive)
1/4 Mile @ 14.0 (www.rx-7.com)

*** Celica GT4 J-Spec (I4, Turbo, w/AWD)
1/4 Mile @ 14.0 (alltrac.net)

*** Mitsubishi EVO 8 (I4, Turbo, w/AWD)
1/4 Mile @ 13.3 (Car&Driver, 2003)

----WELL GUYS THERE ARE SOME ACCURATE STATS W/ SOURCES----

any info, let me know, but don't be talking ****!!!