Feb 19, 2006 - 10:38 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Nov 12, '02 From Columbus, Ohio Currently Offline Reputation: 15 (100%) |
I've been throwing this question back and forth for awhile. In the future I plan on building a 3s. Most of the crazy 3s builds I've seen are running around 22-24 psi with a lowered compression ratio. If you had the choice, would you rather a)lower compression and add more boost or b)keep the compression ratio at 8.5:1 and limit the boost. Or would you say that you'd get the same result either way. Personally I'd go with option A. But I really don't know whether one or the other is more or less hazardous. What do you think is safer,,if either?
|
![]() |
Feb 19, 2006 - 2:59 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jan 17, '04 From Illinois Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) |
stock compression isn't dangerous for a FI application. The danger comes from running pump gas at those levels. Is this going to be a street car? drag? what applications? and what are your hp goals?
-------------------- QUOTE(lagos @ Jul 10, 2006 - 1:55 PM) [snapback]454118[/snapback] i know your trying to do the right thing for your motor, but this is one of those times where you should just trust the guys who have had their swaps for a while and have done a ton of research into this. |
celica3sgte Boost/comp. ratio question Feb 19, 2006 - 10:38 AM
Supersprynt I think option B would be more hazardous because t... Feb 19, 2006 - 12:13 PM
lagos i would keep the stock compression, just so that t... Feb 19, 2006 - 1:53 PM
jgreening I am responding to a PM from Steve.
Assuming you ... Feb 19, 2006 - 6:12 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: November 22nd, 2025 - 8:53 AM |