![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 15, '05 From Toronto Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) ![]() |
so, im intalks with my parents about keepin the celica..its 60/40 right now..60% im keepin it..40% im not...so i figure if i keep it, with my new job, im gonna have some $ to pay around with..so im thinkin of gettin a front lip of some sorts, no sides..like the body lines as is..and im thinkin of gettin a rear lip. I like the body lines of the celica as is, so im thinkin of somethin to play off thouse lines. I was checkin out the parts data base and i found this rear lip from Gangs Jail
![]() i like it, well..minus the plate relocation. It covers the side nicely, witch is good cuz the only reason i wanna get a rear lip is to hide my exhaust piping/muffler from sticking out like a sore thumb. What do you guys think? |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() Joined Mar 15, '06 From Leicester UK. Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
Bumper is nice,
Not sure about the wheelbarrow handles though... ![]() Some how OEM's seem to know best on where/how many tail pipes. BMW M3.... yep, seems good with 2x3" either side 1.1L 86' golf with badly fitted body kit... 4 pipes is just wrong ![]() -------------------- A plesant chap with no ulterior motives
Gen 6, 97 ST202 Jap import. |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() Joined Mar 9, '06 From Crete - Greece Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
QUOTE(alexjb @ Mar 27, 2006 - 4:47 AM) [snapback]413779[/snapback] Bumper is nice, Not sure about the wheelbarrow handles though... ![]() Some how OEM's seem to know best on where/how many tail pipes. BMW M3.... yep, seems good with 2x3" either side 1.1L 86' golf with badly fitted body kit... 4 pipes is just wrong ![]() I agree, but i dont think so that 2x3'' pipes are too much for a swapped gt-four. In the photo, the left pipe is fake but i have diferrent plans about it.. Both pipes will be working of course and they have to take care of a decent horsepower, so i dont think that anyone will say that it is wrong... OEM knows better how many pipes should a celica have but a lot of celicas have 50+ % horsepower than the oem engine, so you have to think about a totally different exaust system to take care of the extra power that the engine produces.. In my case, except from the extra hp that i ve got, I have also removed the catalytic converter so the pressure from the exaust gas is too high for a simple muffler. So, in order to avoid the uptake, to minimize the flames and of course to keep the db low, i have to split the rear tube to a twin muffler, or better to different mufflers. I am sure that when my project will be finished you will love the hand made rear exhaust system and mabe you will change your mind about the two different mufflers. I believe that at least in my case, i will have a gain of +15 hp with this system. Lets hope that the dyno will agree with that!! ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() Joined Mar 15, '06 From Leicester UK. Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
I agree, but i dont think so that 2x3'' pipes are too much for a swapped gt-four. In the photo, the left pipe is fake but i have diferrent plans about it.. Both pipes will be working of course and they have to take care of a decent horsepower, so i dont think that anyone will say that it is wrong... OEM knows better how many pipes should a celica have but a lot of celicas have 50+ % horsepower than the oem engine, so you have to think about a totally different exaust system to take care of the extra power that the engine produces.. In my case, except from the extra hp that i ve got, I have also removed the catalytic converter so the pressure from the exaust gas is too high for a simple muffler. So, in order to avoid the uptake, to minimize the flames and of course to keep the db low, i have to split the rear tube to a twin muffler, or better to different mufflers. I am sure that when my project will be finished you will love the hand made rear exhaust system and mabe you will change your mind about the two different mufflers. I believe that at least in my case, i will have a gain of +15 hp with this system. Lets hope that the dyno will agree with that!! ![]() ![]() [/quote] Agreed, if you need to get rid of the gass then go ahead. You Us guys peobably won't know the ford Ka, but here in UK it's a popular runaround cheap small car. They have now released a sport version, but before that I had one and wanted more power (only comes with a 1.3) so I got a turbo conversion for that, on the rollers it went from 56bhp to 86bhp... I know you're all laughing and saying what's th point but I liked the car shape and it handled great. My point is that removing the CAT and replacing it with a much biger one from a 1.7 ford, plus upgrading to 2 1/4" exhaust all the way put the 86bhp up to 96bhp, a considerable difference by just geting rid of the extra gas. If you need a big pipe, get one! My problem is with the stuck on jobbie on the left of that photo that isn't even linked up! Rant over. ![]() -------------------- A plesant chap with no ulterior motives
Gen 6, 97 ST202 Jap import. |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: September 2nd, 2025 - 9:54 AM |