Apr 6, 2006 - 10:51 PM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined May 15, '05 From Toronto Currently Offline Reputation: 4 (100%) |
So ok, i made a goal for my self a few weeks back, and ive started to work on it. My goal is i wanna be the fastest N/A, no spray, non-swaped (i.e. 3sgte, 3sge, beams, 20V, 4agze, etc.. original type of motor..jdm or not) 6th gen in my province. Right now there arent to many celis out there, and i dont think any one on this site from ontario goes 2 the track too often. So, i have my exhaust done, my intake is gettin revamped soon, my headers are on, so i was thinking...maybe next thing to do would be fuel management. I talked to one of my friends and he said an SAFC2 would b a quick easy way of controlling it. My question is, on a stock internal JDM 5s, would a SAFC be worth while?? would it allow me to controll how much power i could produce at all?? Im very interested, but dont wanna spend a crap load of $ on a full piggy back system like an E-manage or a megasquirt. And please dont post useless crap on here sayin "ur cars not gonna b that fast" or "thats a stupid goal" or n e crap like that.
|
![]() |
Apr 7, 2006 - 8:13 AM
|
|
|
Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 1, '02 From fall river, ma Currently Offline Reputation: 13 (100%) |
why, erik?
ive tuned the 5s with the safc. lowering base pressure and adding really isnt gonna help at all on the 5s, especially with our ecus. i set the A/F reference line @ 13:1 there. from 2-4k its already pretty lean and effecient, and theres not much to pull out up top. from experience, you can remove ~1 point of fuel with ~3-5% correction with the SAFCII, you can get a really nice fuel line with under 10% correction on our cars, which turns into maybe 2* of timing, which is totally save on regular gas in our cars. if you turn down the base pressure, all you'll be doing is hurting the atomization of the fuel, and by adding fuel, youll be retarding timing, and loosing power. its not at all like the 3sgte when it comes to tuning with the SAFC. now, if we WERE talking 3s, i would agree with you. but for the 5s, no. not exactly what valo has in mind. *edit for pic This post has been edited by presure2: Apr 7, 2006 - 8:26 AM -------------------- Former Team 5SFTE pro member ;)
![]() 13.6@108MPH, 5SFTE Powered |
Valo666 SACF II on a N/A motor Apr 6, 2006 - 10:51 PM
Supersprynt It can be useful, but also very dangerous. I would... Apr 6, 2006 - 10:54 PM
Valo666 already planned that..i didnt wanna over fuel and ... Apr 6, 2006 - 10:57 PM
Supersprynt Your not going to grenade it with too much fuel; i... Apr 6, 2006 - 11:03 PM
Sammyr QUOTE(Valo666 @ Apr 6, 2006 - 10:51 ... Apr 6, 2006 - 11:54 PM
presure2 on the 5s, you will use the SAFCII to pull fuel, n... Apr 7, 2006 - 6:54 AM
Supersprynt ^ I disagree and I wouldnt mess with the car's... Apr 7, 2006 - 7:44 AM
Hanyo if you want to go the N/A route, you will need to ... Apr 7, 2006 - 8:41 AM
Valo666 im not gonna go port n polishing..im not really fe... Apr 7, 2006 - 2:52 PM
Sammyr QUOTE(Valo666 @ Apr 7, 2006 - 2:52 P... Apr 8, 2006 - 12:50 AM
presure2 whats the need for monitering fuel pressure?
you w... Apr 7, 2006 - 3:23 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: March 24th, 2026 - 12:22 PM |