Jun 12, 2006 - 12:30 PM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 30, '04 From So Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 13 (100%) |
Thanks for help -------------------- |
![]() |
Jun 14, 2006 - 10:28 AM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 10, '03 From Wichita, KS Currently Offline Reputation: 5 (100%) |
A. is an example of series wiring.
B. is an example of parallel wiring. Assuming those are lights in the first picture, either way will work, but as was mentioned before if one light burns out neither will work. Series and parallel wiring is used all the time with speakers. Older christmas lights used series wiring and when one bulb would go out the entire string wouldn't light... needless to say the newer christmas lights don't use the same style of series wiring. -------------------- ![]() Project ST204.5 99.88946% complete... |
tomazws What's the correct/safest/most common way to split a wire? Jun 12, 2006 - 12:30 PM
playr158 A) won't work because your only doing 1 curren... Jun 12, 2006 - 1:19 PM
snapshotgt QUOTE(playr158 @ Jun 12, 2006 - 1:19... Jun 12, 2006 - 2:04 PM
nsxtypeR Both are correct, but the second is the best optio... Jun 12, 2006 - 2:17 PM
playr158 the first one won't work because the bulb isn... Jun 12, 2006 - 2:18 PM
bojangles_8686 I used B on my fogs and it works fine. Jun 12, 2006 - 2:32 PM
tomazws you guys are awesome.
Thank you. Jun 12, 2006 - 2:41 PM
XS4lv1Truch0x yeah, both wiring meathods work...
a works but it... Jun 14, 2006 - 4:43 PM
tomazws Either I want to split the sidemarker lights to wi... Jun 14, 2006 - 6:22 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: March 23rd, 2026 - 4:53 AM |