Coupes vs. Hatchbacks, It all began with the Coupe! Options

[UTSlickVic]

It all began with the Coupe!

I hate to start this but I'm bored and I like to divided today

PS: I love both hatches and coupes equally. I was just thinking

1) The first Celica was a Coupe... so are the Coupes today "truer" to the original Celica concept?

2) 20 years from now, which will be more rare a 94 Coupe or a 94 Hatchback (not a GT4 )- both in great condition, and assume both are GTs? or STs? whatever


Discuss... ( and please be respectful of eachothers cars )

[BluuFire]

I personally like the hatchback over the coupe stock but i think that all look good (including vert). But again, it really depends on whats been done to them. I've seen some trashed up coupes, hatches, and verts. So looks all depend on whats been done. But kinda back to slick's question:

1) I don't think that the 94 coupe is very true to original because original was a little bit of a diferent design. It was not quite as powerful obviously but it started off as a rear-wheel drive (which was soon changed afterwords). The coupe has changed quite a bit since its debut in many ways, but its still a celica and its a sweet car.

2) As far as which will be more rare in 20 years, I would imagine that there will be less coupes than hatches becuase I believe that there were more hatches sold in 94 than coupes (correct me if im wrong) But Toyota soon found out that the hatchbacks were more well sought after and is why they began to only sell the hatch and vert and totally ditched the coupe in 99'.

Either way, no matter hatch, coupe, or vert, its still a celica and all of them are way cool.

But thats just my 2 cents...