6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> My Exhaust Muffler Theory, Just thought I might share... 56K BEWARE.
post Aug 10, 2006 - 12:30 AM
+Quote Post
ExSane

Enthusiast
***
Joined Apr 17, '06
From under your bed.
Currently Offline

Reputation: 4 (100%)




Ok, here is my theory on exhaust mufflers. Basically this... faster exhaust goes out the faster air comes in. Lesser back pressure, the better the exhaust flow. The better the faster the exhaust flow, the better the gains. Here are the designs I used to conclude this theory.

IPB Image

HKS, Apexi N1 type mufflers - Becuz of the design and the edge of the canister is kinda sharp tipped, there maybe a little back pressure on the air flow. HKS Hi-Power has rather a large canister (larger than N1) and can cause a 'slight' back pressure depending on the output of fuel pulses coming from the engine. The stronger and faster the pulses, the less to worry about it. That's probably why most of these mufflers are used for Turbo's. Besides that, people just go for looks with these.

Otto Racing, Blitz type mufflers - The canister designs on these type of mufflers are curved into the tip pipe causing straight through exhaust flow. I don't even think there is any back pressure on this type of muffler design. Everything is pretty much straight through design. I think this is probably the best choice for N/A engines.

Greddy SP, Magnaflow type mufflers - This type of design is known to increase horsepower without ruining the stock look. The only difference between this muffler and the stock one is the piping size. The inlet/outlet diameters are bigger causing a little bit more flow. As you can see up in that picture, there are a lot of back pressure and restrictions made to air flow. This could also be the reason why this muffler isn't that loud and is slightly louder than stock.

Greddy EVO, OBX (EVO wannabe) type mufflers - Now this is an interesting design. From the looks of it, this muffler is design to have no back pressure. But considering the fact that it isn't straight through design, there might be a very slight back pressure on the exhaust flow. I haven't seen anyone with this muffler on at the races but I bet you this muffler will probably be a good add to performance as well as different.

Stock type mufflers - As you can see pictures, the piping for this type of muffler is rather small and they restrict fuel pulses in your exhaust. Back pressure is pretty heavy with this muffler and is probably why you feel so much gain when you take this thing out. As I said about my theory, "faster exhaust goes out the faster air comes in". Basically your engine breathes faster and farts faster. Your heart will beat faster. And then your legs will run faster. LoL. Metaphorically speaking...

Straight Piping type mufflers - Ahhh one of my most interesting ones. This is design is just pretty much straight through design without canister filteration which means no back pressure what so ever. Probably one of the best for choices for 6 cylinders and over. Thus reason being GT mustangs become so freakin quick with this mod. A 2002 Honda Civic EX VTEC coupe burned me and a V6 Firebird (I think stock) out of the streets with his straight pipe. And to think I kept up with that Firebird. The civic sounded like a damn muscle car. Probably one of my most interesting races I've experienced at the street race meets.

So, what you guys think??? biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by ExSane: Aug 10, 2006 - 12:33 AM


--------------------
 
Start new topic
Replies
post Aug 10, 2006 - 1:02 PM
+Quote Post
CelicaGT04



Enthusiast
***
Joined Nov 22, '05
From Mesquite, Texas
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (50%)




Well i thought i knew that SOME back pressure was needed for N/A cars. I apparently thought that having straight pipe on a N/A motor would= loss of low end torque(which it might do). But as i read a topic on a forum, i read that the only thing that back pressure really does is lower the turbulance. It can, if you do not upgrade your fuel system burn your exhaust valves. But then again that wont happen after the first week, or month of having it. Turbo cars would not need back pressure as you are trying to release the air/fuel as quickly as possible.

"basically, theres 2 parts to the equation of airflow, both intake and exhaust- backpressure and velocity. backpressure is always bad. ideally an i/c engine wants no backpressure. however, as most people know, slapping a 3" exhaust on a stock motor generally hurts low end torque... this is thanks to our friend, velocity. air is a fluid, it has fluid properties. if you know what a syphon is, then thats exactly how the intake and exhaust colums of air work. the faster the column is moving, the more air is sucked in the intake using that vaccume, and the more is pulled out on the exhaust. ideally, you want very high velocity with very low backpressure. obviously this is pretty impossible to achieve across the rev range, as the airflow varies widely in its volume and velocity from idle to redline. choosing an exhaust/header/intake/ intake manifold/cams/head port that all work together to put that mix of velocity and backpressure where you want the maximum gain."

this is quoted from a guy on a forum.

I think i have it understood. Hope i am of some service.

This post has been edited by CelicaGT04: Aug 10, 2006 - 1:02 PM

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: July 29th, 2025 - 9:21 AM