wow you're smart, theories +1 Options

[playr158]

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

This post has been edited by playr158: Aug 14, 2006 - 3:38 PM

[Mynzeyes]

the only thing i like about that website is the counter:

669,401 people have been bukkaked.

For those that don't know what a "bukkake" is, I pity you. Get your learn on.


That guy does nothing to disprove anything. He just says "nah ugh!", and calls people names. Popular Mechanics does a nice job. And of course, coming from them, it makes sense. But there has still yet to be visual evidence. That's all I'm offering to this.

That, and the bukkake link. Bc that shxt is funny.

-John-

[jgreening]

Popular Mechanics does a nice job. And of course, coming from them, it makes sense. But there has still yet to be visual evidence.

Where I am from, the people positing the wacky theory are the ones who have to present the evidence.

You want the truth? All the conspiracy stuff regarding 9/11 is pure crap. There ya go.

Edit: I can't believe Dan and I agree on something.

This post has been edited by jgreening: Aug 14, 2006 - 1:37 PM

[Mynzeyes]

Popular Mechanics does a nice job. And of course, coming from them, it makes sense. But there has still yet to be visual evidence.

Where I am from, the people positing the wacky theory are the ones who have to present the evidence.

You want the truth? All the conspiracy stuff regarding 9/11 is pure crap. There ya go.

Edit: I can't believe Dan and I agree on something.

there is evidence. the fact that you don't believe it doesn't make it untrue. it just means you don't believe it. it's not really a wacky theory anyway. saying the conspiracy theories re: 9/11 is "pure crap" is your opinion. i have mine.

there have been many questions about the events, and no, not just the "loose change" video. the opposing sides do have evidence j, in the form of pictures, videos, statements, etc. notice i said "VISUAL EVIDENCE". everyone says this, and says that, but there is never a picture of a plane (specifically speaking of the pentagon and PA/flight 93 site). as i told dan. i'm not against being proved wrong, i'd like to be. i'd like to think the govenerment wouldn't do something like that, but i honestly don't put it past them.

i'm not going into it anymore than that. there is/was already a thread somewhat about this, and it's something that will spiral down into a debate, and get locked by the fun police. you're entitled to your opinion, as i am to mine. but, since it's not your's, and in the best interest of the nation, that makes it ridiculous and ignorant. i let you have your opinion, so let me have mine.

-John-

BTW Dan, before you poke like a smart ass at people for being smart, maybe you should proofread your own titles for your posts...

This post has been edited by Mynzeyes: Aug 14, 2006 - 2:51 PM

[jgreening]

you're entitled to your opinion, as i am to mine. but, since it's not your's, and in the best interest of the nation, that makes it ridiculous and ignorant. i let you have your opinion, so let me have mine.

Thats one of the great things about our country. You have a right to be wrong. As long as you acknowledge that your belief in this hocus pocus is just an opinion, I have no issues. The problem I have is with all these people who spout it off like its fact and even have the audacity to post up "so called evidence" that is completely crap.

We have to remember that the one positing the position has the burden to prove it - not the one trying to prove the negative.

Can I prove that the government was not involved with 9/11? No, but I have seen no credible evidence to the contrary. As such, why would I even think such a thing? I am an American after all.