![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 5, '07 From bowling green, ky Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
hey i just joined up, i just picked up a 94 st hatch a few weeks ago, all stock except for the 40 or so hours me and my friend dumped on it repainting it a audi charcoal grey, but really what i was wondering is why the 1.8 in the celica is weaker then some others. my last car before this was a 1997 mazda miata, which was a fun car, it had a 1.8 and it put out 136hp and had a 7300 redline..i mean even a baseline integra put out 140hp..i could never really understand giving a car that looks like this 115hp and redline not even worth reaching...oh well, i still like it and hopeing to knock the power up a bit in the near future
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast Joined Feb 5, '07 From bowling green, ky Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
yeah, i mean i understand that it isnt a sporty engine, im just wondering more of why would they put a econobox engine in a sporty car? i mean my friends 93 i4 camry is faster
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 30, '04 From So Cal Currently Offline Reputation: 13 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(vizonofdisorder @ Feb 5, 2007 - 12:28 PM) [snapback]524169[/snapback] yeah, i mean i understand that it isnt a sporty engine, im just wondering more of why would they put a econobox engine in a sporty car? i mean my friends 93 i4 camry is faster ![]() Should've gotten a GT ![]() -------------------- |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: June 10th, 2025 - 9:41 AM |