![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jul 14, '03 From Jacksonville, FL Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) ![]() |
So, I've run into a little bit of a problem at work. Someone came in asking for help with this theorem and I can't seem to figure it out. Actually, my entire work couldn't figure it out. I work at a math tutoring place. Basically, I feel like an idiot for not understanding it.
It's analytical geometry based. Anyone want a challenge? [edit] Holy sht. Now after I posted the topic, I understand it. LOL. Of courseeeee that was going to happen. ![]() Poo. [edit2] Ok, jk. Maybe I don't. Help, still. lol.. This post has been edited by Jen: Mar 11, 2007 - 9:01 PM -------------------- |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jul 29, '03 From north of detroit Currently Offline Reputation: 6 (100%) ![]() |
if i understand correctly that theorem 3.7 is the topic of interest:
in order to validate the distance from a point P to the line Ax+By+C=0 as a positive or negative value, P must be above or below the line. by substituting the x and y coordinates of P into the equation and comparing the sign of the obtained value to the sign of the coefficient B, the realtive location of P is known. i'd have to write a proof by hand if that's what you were looking for, that might take a few. -------------------- ![]() do you know who i am, mr. worley? |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: July 25th, 2025 - 4:29 PM |