![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jan 9, '03 From St. Louis Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
Hey guys, I know this isn't the most exciting topic, but I was wondering if you could help me out. In the sentance below, is it correct grammer to use the apostophe in it's, or is it correct to leave it out in this instance.
Word is correcting me, but I was curious if I was wrong or not. I mean, the obstacles are technically the "property" of the rational choice theory. On various occasions, combined rational thinkers use social capital to achieve great results, however rational choice is not without it’s obstacles. Thanks guys and girls. -------------------- [img]http://photos-081.facebook.com/n6/081/n15913038_30266081_3342.jpg[/img]
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Jan 9, '03 From St. Louis Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
Do you not use an apostrophe when saying "Jim's sandwich"?
I thought you were supposed to use the apostrophe when showing possession and when it's a conjunction and I would think this would be possession. just be because I have substituted "rational choice" with it, does the idea of an apostrophe to show possession go out the window? Or, is this not an example of possession in the first place, can theory "possess" problems? -------------------- [img]http://photos-081.facebook.com/n6/081/n15913038_30266081_3342.jpg[/img]
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: July 24th, 2025 - 12:09 PM |