Apr 13, 2007 - 10:31 AM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 5, '06 From Maryland Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
I would post on a supra forum, but they're douches and I think you guys know more about cars anyway.
|
![]() |
Apr 13, 2007 - 5:27 PM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() Joined Aug 5, '06 From Maryland Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
In the part of MD I'm in I need to emmision every two years. The W58 is a solid trans, but if I'm going auto-manual why not just do a V160 or V161. They can hold way more power and if I get a hold of a tt lsd (and a custom driveshaft), I'll be set no matter how much I build it in the future. I will probably get the 2jz-ge engine because the only difference between that and the 2jz-gte's bottom end is oil squirters. I'd lower compression probably with a thinner HG like Valo said. From there I want to run a simple small NA-T setup. Probably some of DaveH's stuff, maybe bigger later on. But that's all hypothetical if I buy it.
I just wanted to see if I did put in any manual and turbo if it would make a difference. I think I could talk the guy doing it into grading me as a turbo... I hope, and yea I geuss manual won't make a difference. Thanks for the ideas! |
phokur Thinking about a MKIV project Apr 13, 2007 - 10:31 AM
playr158 depends on your year and the motor it came with or... Apr 13, 2007 - 10:34 AM
phokur SWEEEET! Thanks! Apr 13, 2007 - 11:02 AM
phokur For the turbo, I know that emissions would test th... Apr 13, 2007 - 1:07 PM
Consynx 6spd V160 tranny is >$2000
2jz-ge is your ... Apr 13, 2007 - 1:39 PM
Valo666 i would say go with the W58 too. If your gonna kee... Apr 13, 2007 - 3:02 PM
jayi12-15psi why would the trans. effect emissions? Apr 13, 2007 - 4:01 PM
phokur Nope checked it out today, waaaay too much of a ... Apr 14, 2007 - 8:41 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: October 28th, 2025 - 9:34 AM |