![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Apr 2, '07 From Great Western Plateau Currently Offline Reputation: 9 (100%) ![]() |
I was driving home one day in my belove celica....a question popped up in my head "what makes a second, a second"??...i know there are atomic clocks that miss a second in like 1 million year but how did we even measure a second in the first place...?
Now, a day consists of 24 hours and 1hr=3600 seconds. But we could have had 12 hours in a day and keep the same duration of a second so the number of seconds would still be 3600..it just takes twice as long to move a second to a second...so how and what instument were used to measure a second?? Imagine a second's duration were 10 times faster than today than one would says "yez..my celica can do 0-60mph in abt 60 seconds.." LOL ...yep thats a minute. ![]() -------------------- ![]() 98% completion --- aaRon |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Apr 17, '06 From New Jersey Currently Offline Reputation: 105 (100%) ![]() |
QUOTE(carb0n_f1b3r @ Jul 16, 2007 - 3:12 PM) [snapback]579183[/snapback] I would suggest sticking to a nominal unit of time or vector as a definition..as velocity increases the duration of the second increases, or the faster you go the slower time goes heres the wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity physics rocks ![]() ![]() that's deep water, that's basically the 3rd postulate of the relativity theory that Einstein always talked about ![]() being honest it took me a couple hours to actually get the concept of such theory and then it took me a couple days to accept it. modern physics can get you looking like Einstein in no time. -------------------- ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: July 7th, 2025 - 5:36 PM |