Jul 15, 2007 - 9:31 PM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Apr 2, '07 From Great Western Plateau Currently Offline Reputation: 9 (100%) |
I was driving home one day in my belove celica....a question popped up in my head "what makes a second, a second"??...i know there are atomic clocks that miss a second in like 1 million year but how did we even measure a second in the first place...?
Now, a day consists of 24 hours and 1hr=3600 seconds. But we could have had 12 hours in a day and keep the same duration of a second so the number of seconds would still be 3600..it just takes twice as long to move a second to a second...so how and what instument were used to measure a second?? Imagine a second's duration were 10 times faster than today than one would says "yez..my celica can do 0-60mph in abt 60 seconds.." LOL ...yep thats a minute. -------------------- ![]() 98% completion --- aaRon |
![]() |
Jul 18, 2007 - 8:44 PM
|
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Oct 31, '02 From Boise, ID Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%) |
Also, interesting to note why time was divided using the base 60 and 12 number systems (that the wikipedia article didn't answer) is because 360 is close to 365. Thus, early western atronomers (Ptolemy mainly) chose the 360 as easy, hence the 60 base. The great sphere (aka the sky, or heavens) move about 1° a day if you have 360° be a full circle. From this convention of 360 for a full circle, a base 60 system was convenient. Thus... as said above... convention, by means of the base 60 system, determined the second.
So, why is a second a second? Well... because the number 365 is close to 360. -------------------- ![]() psalm 69 |
lubu have you ever wonder "what makes a second...a second?" Jul 15, 2007 - 9:31 PM
zachattack15 Stop thinking. Jul 15, 2007 - 10:40 PM
x_itchy_b_x its just a term for measuring how much time has pa... Jul 15, 2007 - 10:49 PM
Silver94CelicaOwner I'm going to play a game and guess why this th... Jul 15, 2007 - 11:11 PM
Culpable04 1 second can be calculated by the total movement o... Jul 16, 2007 - 12:55 AM
BloodyStupidDavey QUOTE(Culpable04 @ Jul 16, 2007 - 6... Jul 16, 2007 - 2:56 AM
phonex98 what culpable said. Goes like this
We know one da... Jul 16, 2007 - 1:04 AM
shin i swear man... topics here just gets weirder and w... Jul 16, 2007 - 10:45 AM
tomazws Are we gonna go into why "second" is CAL... Jul 16, 2007 - 11:54 AM
BloodyStupidDavey QUOTE(tomazws @ Jul 16, 2007 - 5:54 ... Jul 16, 2007 - 4:31 PM
tomazws QUOTE(BloodyStupidDavey @ Jul 16, 2007 ... Jul 16, 2007 - 4:42 PM
phonex98 sure ! Why not. This from wikipedia:
Twelve
... Jul 16, 2007 - 12:03 PM
playr158 measurements of cesium FTW
go take a college leve... Jul 16, 2007 - 12:34 PM
lubu QUOTEg
go take a college level physics 2 class and... Jul 16, 2007 - 1:27 PM
carb0n_f1b3r I would suggest sticking to a nominal unit of time... Jul 16, 2007 - 3:12 PM
playr158 QUOTE(lubu @ Jul 16, 2007 - 2:27 PM)... Jul 16, 2007 - 3:39 PM
Culpable04 QUOTE(carb0n_f1b3r @ Jul 16, 2007 - 3... Jul 16, 2007 - 4:30 PM
lubu QUOTE(playr158 @ Jul 17, 2007 - 4:39... Jul 16, 2007 - 11:21 PM
RbrtNdrws Why aren't they called "firsts" ? E... Jul 17, 2007 - 2:00 PM
lubu well i guess there is a more accurate time device.... Jul 23, 2007 - 2:29 PM
carb0n_f1b3r ^^^^^
took me a "second" to get it you... Jul 23, 2007 - 4:14 PM
lubu QUOTE(carb0n_f1b3r @ Jul 24, 2007 - 5... Jul 23, 2007 - 4:48 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: October 26th, 2025 - 4:57 PM |