"Airflow and How it Makes Ponies" Theory, Someone help me out. Options

[FortuneCookie]

Alright guys. I've been looking into intake induction for a while now. I've probably changed out my intake design probably 5 times already just to try to get better gains. I was thinking about getting cold-air intake next since I have a short-ram intake. BUT, as I was thinking, something hit me and it got me questioning really good. As people keep talking about intake, they talk about airflow and how it gives more horsepower by more airflow into the chamber. And ofcourse, more air means more fuel needed. But something else hit me hard. I've changed my intake system a couple times already and all of them felt different in responce. Not majorly but you can tell (it's ur car, you would know). Intake isn't about how much air is going in. Now that I think of it, it's about vacuum! It's not air getting pushed in, it's air getting pulled in. So I questioned to myself, how do I increase the vacuum velocity so that I can get some better gain than what I have now. Well I did some quick research. Apparently, it's all physics. Something that I'm not good at. But my uncle majored in Quantum Physics in college. So I asked him, "Hey, do you know anything about vacuum and velocity for airflow?" And he said, "Yeah. What for?" I said, "I'm trying to figure out how to make air sucked in faster into the my engine without having to spend a big butchet." And he said, "The smaller the pipe, the more vacuum you'll create." And I paused. I said to myself, wait a minute, most of the time, bigger is better when it comes to cars. Like for instance, the bigger the tubing, the more space it would have to channel air to be vacuumed. But it would not create faster vacuum or would it? Not sure but I decided to do more research. And it turns out, that constriction (snake swirl) type tubing actually helps vacuum velocity increase. Not only that but if you have a constriction figure at the both ends or in the middle of a tube, velocity speed increases and also less pressure. I'm stealing these methods from G. B. Venturi who died 1822 as a Italian physicist. http://biyografi.info/kelime/venturi So I figured, how come no ones ever really thought about this? This would actually evolutionize intake tubing design. What do you guys think? Am I onto something?

This post has been edited by FortuneCookie: Aug 15, 2007 - 10:35 AM

[x_itchy_b_x]

because how much air an engine can ingest isn't determined by its intake.
Well it is, like if you had no air at all then an engine wont run, but adding restrictions to gain velocity isn't going to do any good.

velocity of air and how much air is in that velocity is what is key.
of course I can push more air at a higher velocity out of a straw than a 4 inch pipe. Guaranteed the larger 4 inch pipe flows more air though, just at a lower velocity.

besides once that air is past the intake an in the manifold it doesn't matter how much velocity you think your adding because the air just slams into the valves that ultimately determine how much you ingest.

Just stick to getting the most cold air into the intake with the least restrictions possible.

I'm not a physics major, this is just what ive come up with. Just my .02