6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Different Rear Subframe?, GT and ST
post Nov 8, 2007 - 3:35 PM
+Quote Post
Kadett



Enthusiast
*****
Joined Mar 17, '05
From The Netherlands
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Since I'm finally getting my exhaust done, and was debating over under/over axle exhaust, I took a look at the rear subframe.

From what I can see is the GT models have a 'holding plate' or somesort on the subframe to hold the suspension arm bolts.

Take a look

Pictures from lagos (GT) rear subframe:
IPB Image

Picture from 95CelicaST
IPB Image

Can anyone ellaborate about this, just curious. Will go to Mr T in the morning to check the EPC.


--------------------
JDM Powerplant installed, BPU coming very soon!

IPB Image
 
Start new topic
Replies
post Nov 8, 2007 - 3:53 PM
+Quote Post
94celigts



Enthusiast
**
Joined Jun 13, '07
From Whitby, ON, CAN
Currently Offline

Reputation: 6 (100%)




oh interesting enough. i never knew that... maybe its some un-needed weight our fat GT's can spare to lose.
post Nov 8, 2007 - 7:38 PM
+Quote Post
6strngs



Enthusiast
*****
Joined May 12, '06
From Wilmington, NC
Currently Offline

Reputation: 45 (100%)




QUOTE(94celigts @ Nov 8, 2007 - 12:53 PM) [snapback]612373[/snapback]

oh interesting enough. i never knew that... maybe its some un-needed weight our fat GT's can spare to lose.

or it could stiffen up the rear end for better handling?


--------------------

94 GT - Sold -------- 69 Pontiac Lemans - Sold
88 Alltrac - Sold ---- 04 WRX - Sold
00 GT-S - Sold ------ 91 Miata - project/drift car
95 GT - Sold -------- 96 GT - New Daily Drive

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: December 7th, 2025 - 4:24 PM