![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Enthusiast ![]() Joined Oct 17, '07 From San Diego Currently Offline Reputation: 0 (0%) ![]() |
so in you guys experience what is better or more fun to use when it comes to turbo? It can be from any standpoint relible,less work to keep running,better performance, availibility, wich one blows easier? Feel free to just add your .02 cents personal experiences and even time slips.
(if a thread like this already exists disregard this one) This post has been edited by wannabealilfaster: Dec 27, 2007 - 2:27 PM |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Enthusiast ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Joined Mar 29, '07 From Philly Currently Offline Reputation: 11 (100%) ![]() |
i would take a stock turbo car over a n/a turboed car any day for the simple fact that it was built for the power.....for instance if i had the choice between a 2002 srt-4 and a neon r/t turbo.... and they were both puttin down the same amount of hp and runnin about the same time id take the srt-4 for the reliability factor and it's going to last longer....just my .02
-------------------- ![]() I"M NOT A TOYOTA FAN, IM A FANATIC 1984 accord hatch 5 speed (T-Belt)-Junkyard 1991 VDUB jetta wolfsburg Ed. 5 speed (clutch)-junkyard 1988 Dodge Aries K (sold) 1969 Chevy El camino - Traded for celica 1991 Dodge Daytona-Traded for Celica 1988 Chevy Camaro-Work in Progress 1989 Ford Mustang LX 5.0 - For Sale 1995 Toyota Celica-Work in Progress |
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: September 2nd, 2025 - 12:17 AM |