 exhausting the exhaust topic... |
 Feb 1, 2008 - 3:28 AM
|
 
|
 Enthusiast  Joined Nov 1, '07 From Santa Barbara, CA Currently Offline Reputation: 2 (100%)  |
I've been reading up on the size piping everyone uses and I can't decide between 2.25 and 2.5. People argue both ways. My car has a SRI and header. Which will give the better overall performance? Any additional imput is helpful too. Thanks
|
 |
Replies
|
Feb 1, 2008 - 12:59 PM
|
|
 Enthusiast Joined Mar 27, '04 Currently Offline Reputation: 14 (100%) |
I think there really isn't much difference between 2.25 and 2.5.. I have heard that 3 is a little big for a NA engine..
but what you have to consider is that NA engines need back-pressure.. so too small and the engine can breathe, too big and the engine looses power from no back pressure. This post has been edited by Jaws4God: Feb 1, 2008 - 1:00 PM -------------------- ~Daniel~ No Longer Celica Owner.. moved on to a 03 WRX-EJ207
 |
Posts in this topic
99Celica exhausting the exhaust topic... Feb 1, 2008 - 3:28 AM
Stogbob I made one of these types of threads like a month ... Feb 1, 2008 - 2:17 PM playr158 2.25 will give you "more" low end power
... Feb 1, 2008 - 2:26 PM Supersprynt Save yourself some cash: 2.25 will suit you fine. Feb 1, 2008 - 2:48 PM Celicav I love the way you worded the topic
...and yes,... Feb 1, 2008 - 6:58 PM 99Celica Well I asked around my friends as well and I think... Feb 2, 2008 - 1:03 PM Celicav Yes, that is a good price for a catback install in... Feb 2, 2008 - 4:48 PM
laff09 QUOTE(Celicav @ Feb 2, 2008 - 4:48 P... Feb 2, 2008 - 5:31 PM 99Celica Is it that bad w/o a resonator? I planned on not g... Feb 3, 2008 - 12:01 PM Galcobar A resonator (note, not the same as a glasspack or ... Feb 4, 2008 - 10:21 PM 99Celica alright that definitely sounds like something i... Feb 5, 2008 - 2:54 AM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: July 22nd, 2025 - 11:04 AM |