6G Celicas Forums

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Idea: Twin Intercooled
post Oct 8, 2003 - 6:08 PM
+Quote Post
Inferno



Enthusiast
***
Joined Jan 30, '03
From Virginia
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




Several people have inquired in the past about Twin Turbo. More recently it was discussed that a Twin Turbo setup on a four-cylinder is completely pointless. We all know that turbo's create unwanted heat. I had the idea, while sitting in class today, of a Twin Intercooled engine. I don't know if anyone has ever done it, but I'd like to ask about it.

We all know that the 3S-GTE has a Top Mount Intercooler. I've read threads about putting a FMIC (Front Mount Intercooler) on a 3S-GTE engine. People have said it is possible, but it would need custom piping. So, this brought about the idea of a Twin Intercooled engine.

I figured if a person could mount a FMIC on a 3S-GTE (with custom piping of course), then why couldn't they simply connect it to the TMIC and have double the cooled air charge. I figure it would keep a high-powered engine MUCH cooler than normal. I also figured it was possible since there isn't a FMIC stock with the 3S-GTE engine, therefore there is the space to do it with.

Get back to me, people! I appreciate all who contribute!

This post has been edited by Inferno: Oct 8, 2003 - 6:08 PM
 
Start new topic
Replies
post Oct 10, 2003 - 9:16 PM
+Quote Post
SpedToe169



Enthusiast
***
Joined Aug 29, '02
From Dallas, Tx
Currently Offline

Reputation: 0 (0%)




QUOTE (Supersprynt @ Oct 9, 2003 - 7:08 PM)
What im saying with the time it takes for the air to get to the throttle body is that it has more time to warm up and that just happens u cant help it. And i disaggree with the pumping air throughout the car because if you have a FMIC its like 3x the length the air has to travel and thats definately a factor.

QUOTE
What im saying with the time it takes for the air to get to the throttle body is that it has more time to warm up and that just happens u cant help it.


Ok, I'll go with you on that one. I think the actual length of the piping is negligible but the effect is there on some level.

QUOTE
And i disaggree with the pumping air throughout the car because if you have a FMIC its like 3x the length the air has to travel and thats definately a factor.


You're right, it definitely is a factor, but its not enough of a factor to matter. The restriction due to the intercooler and, in engineering terms the 'K factor' associated with the intercooler(s), is much higher than the K factors associated with straight piping sections and with mandrel bends (crush bends are a whole other story, stay away from them!).

Just to put some numbers with this, its pretty common to see a 1 or 1.5 psi pressure drop across an intercooler (due to the restriction). Ten feet of tubing and say...six mandrel bands will produce a pressure drop of about 0.1 or 0.2 psi at the flow rates and velocities that we're talking about. The size limitations on a TMIC mean that it usually can't be as big and can't flow as well as a FMIC so this fact more than negates the losses due to the extra tubing required for an FMIC.

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: February 12th, 2026 - 7:42 PM